Anant S Vemuri1, Jungle Chi-Hsiang Wu, Kai-Che Liu, Hurng-Sheng Wu. 1. Medical Image Research Department, Asian Institute of Telesurgery (IRCAD-Taiwan), Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, 505, Taiwan ROC. avemuri@knights.ucf.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures have undergone considerable advancement during the last few decades. More recently, the availability of some imaging methods intraoperatively has added a new dimension to minimally invasive techniques. Augmented reality in surgery has been a topic of intense interest and research. METHODS: Augmented reality involves usage of computer vision algorithms on video from endoscopic cameras or cameras mounted in the operating room to provide the surgeon additional information that he or she otherwise would have to recognize intuitively. One of the techniques combines a virtual preoperative model of the patient with the endoscope camera using natural or artificial landmarks to provide an augmented reality view in the operating room. The authors' approach is to provide this with the least number of changes to the operating room. Software architecture is presented to provide interactive adjustment in the registration of a three-dimensional (3D) model and endoscope video. RESULTS: Augmented reality including adrenalectomy, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and retrocaval ureter and pancreas was used to perform 12 surgeries. The general feedback from the surgeons has been very positive not only in terms of deciding the positions for inserting points but also in knowing the least change in anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: The approach involves providing a deformable 3D model architecture and its application to the operating room. A 3D model with a deformable structure is needed to show the shape change of soft tissue during the surgery. The software architecture to provide interactive adjustment in registration of the 3D model and endoscope video with adjustability of every 3D model is presented.
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures have undergone considerable advancement during the last few decades. More recently, the availability of some imaging methods intraoperatively has added a new dimension to minimally invasive techniques. Augmented reality in surgery has been a topic of intense interest and research. METHODS: Augmented reality involves usage of computer vision algorithms on video from endoscopic cameras or cameras mounted in the operating room to provide the surgeon additional information that he or she otherwise would have to recognize intuitively. One of the techniques combines a virtual preoperative model of the patient with the endoscope camera using natural or artificial landmarks to provide an augmented reality view in the operating room. The authors' approach is to provide this with the least number of changes to the operating room. Software architecture is presented to provide interactive adjustment in the registration of a three-dimensional (3D) model and endoscope video. RESULTS: Augmented reality including adrenalectomy, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and retrocaval ureter and pancreas was used to perform 12 surgeries. The general feedback from the surgeons has been very positive not only in terms of deciding the positions for inserting points but also in knowing the least change in anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: The approach involves providing a deformable 3D model architecture and its application to the operating room. A 3D model with a deformable structure is needed to show the shape change of soft tissue during the surgery. The software architecture to provide interactive adjustment in registration of the 3D model and endoscope video with adjustability of every 3D model is presented.
Authors: Christoph F Dickhaus; Catherina Burghart; Clare Tempany; Anthony D'Amico; Steven Haker; Ron Kikinis; Heinz Woern Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2004
Authors: Christian Hansen; Jan Wieferich; Felix Ritter; Christian Rieder; Heinz-Otto Peitgen Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: S A Nicolau; A Vemuri; H S Wu; M H Huang; Y Ho; A Charnoz; A Hostettler; C Forest; L Soler; J Marescaux Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2011
Authors: Xenophon Papademetris; Christine DeLorenzo; Sven Flossmann; Markus Neff; Kenneth P Vives; Dennis D Spencer; Lawrence H Staib; James S Duncan Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Andinet Enquobahrie; Patrick Cheng; Kevin Gary; Luis Ibanez; David Gobbi; Frank Lindseth; Ziv Yaniv; Stephen Aylward; Julien Jomier; Kevin Cleary Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2007-08-17 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Hannes G Kenngott; Martin Wagner; Matthias Gondan; Felix Nickel; Marco Nolden; Andreas Fetzer; Jürgen Weitz; Lars Fischer; Stefanie Speidel; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Dittmar Böckler; Markus W Büchler; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Cherif Akladios; Victor Gabriele; Vincent Agnus; Camille Martel-Billard; Ralph Saadeh; Olivier Garbin; Lise Lecointre; Jacques Marescaux Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Arash Abiri; Yichen Ding; Parinaz Abiri; René R Sevag Packard; Vijay Vedula; Alison Marsden; C-C Jay Kuo; Tzung K Hsiai Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Dongheon Lee; Hyoun-Joong Kong; Donguk Kim; Jin Wook Yi; Young Jun Chai; Kyu Eun Lee; Hee Chan Kim Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 1.859