BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver surgery is particularly challenging owing to restricted access, risk of bleeding, and lack of haptic feedback. Navigation systems have the potential to improve information on the exact position of intrahepatic tumors, and thus facilitate oncological resection. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a commercially available augmented reality (AR) guidance system employing intraoperative robotic C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for laparoscopic liver surgery. METHODS: A human liver-like phantom with 16 target fiducials was used to evaluate the Syngo iPilot(®) AR system. Subsequently, the system was used for the laparoscopic resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 7 of a 50-year-old male patient. RESULTS: In the phantom experiment, the AR system showed a mean target registration error of 0.96 ± 0.52 mm, with a maximum error of 2.49 mm. The patient successfully underwent the operation and showed no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative CBCT and AR for laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and could be considered an option for future liver surgery in complex cases.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver surgery is particularly challenging owing to restricted access, risk of bleeding, and lack of haptic feedback. Navigation systems have the potential to improve information on the exact position of intrahepatic tumors, and thus facilitate oncological resection. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a commercially available augmented reality (AR) guidance system employing intraoperative robotic C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for laparoscopic liver surgery. METHODS: A human liver-like phantom with 16 target fiducials was used to evaluate the Syngo iPilot(®) AR system. Subsequently, the system was used for the laparoscopic resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 7 of a 50-year-old male patient. RESULTS: In the phantom experiment, the AR system showed a mean target registration error of 0.96 ± 0.52 mm, with a maximum error of 2.49 mm. The patient successfully underwent the operation and showed no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative CBCT and AR for laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and could be considered an option for future liver surgery in complex cases.
Authors: H G Kenngott; J Neuhaus; B P Müller-Stich; I Wolf; M Vetter; H-P Meinzer; J Köninger; M W Büchler; C N Gutt Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Barbara Bussels; Laurence Goethals; Michel Feron; Didier Bielen; Steven Dymarkowski; Paul Suetens; Karin Haustermans Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: M Wagner; M Gondan; C Zöllner; J J Wünscher; F Nickel; L Albala; A Groch; S Suwelack; S Speidel; L Maier-Hein; B P Müller-Stich; H G Kenngott Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Christian Viehland; Brenton Keller; Mark Draelos; Anthony N Kuo; Cynthia A Toth; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Vanessa M Banz; Philip C Müller; Pascale Tinguely; Daniel Inderbitzin; Delphine Ribes; Matthias Peterhans; Daniel Candinas; Stefan Weber Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Iwan Paolucci; Marius Schwalbe; Gian Andrea Prevost; Anja Lachenmayer; Daniel Candinas; Stefan Weber; Pascale Tinguely Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: H G Kenngott; M Wagner; F Nickel; A L Wekerle; A Preukschas; M Apitz; T Schulte; R Rempel; P Mietkowski; F Wagner; A Termer; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 3.445