Cherif Akladios1, Victor Gabriele2, Vincent Agnus3, Camille Martel-Billard1, Ralph Saadeh1, Olivier Garbin1, Lise Lecointre1, Jacques Marescaux3. 1. Service de Gynécologie - Site de Hautepierre, Pôle de Gynécologie-Obstétrique des Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France. 2. Service de Gynécologie - Site de Hautepierre, Pôle de Gynécologie-Obstétrique des Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France. Victor.gabriele@chru-strasbourg.fr. 3. Institut de chirurgie guidée par l'image (IHU) de Strasbourg, 1 place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a non-invasive surgical assistance based on augmented reality (AR) in the detection of ureters on animal model. METHOD: After an experimental prototyping step on two pigs to determine the optimal conditions for visualization of the ureter in AR, three pigs were operated three times at 1 week intervals. The intervention consisted of an identification of the ureter, with and without the assistance of AR. At the end of the intervention, a clip was placed on the AR-proposed ureter to evaluate its accuracy. By doing a cone beam computed tomography, we measured the distance between the contrasted ureter and the clips in the acquired volume. Thirteen videos were recorded, allowing subsequent evaluation of the clinical relevance of the device. RESULTS: The feasibility of the technique has been confirmed. The margin of error was 1.77 mm (± 1.56 mm) for ureter localization accuracy. In order to evaluate the perceived relevance and accuracy in the detection of AR-assisted ureter, 58 gynecological surgeons were shown the videos then questioned. Of the 754 responses obtained (13 videos × 58 surgeons), the ureter was identified in direct vision in 31.2% of cases versus 81.7% in AR (p value 3.62 × 10-7). When looking at pigs that had already had one or two operations, the ureter was identified in only 16% of cases with direct vision compared to 76.1% with AR (p-value 5.48 × 10-19). In addition, 67% of surgeons felt that AR allowed them to better identify the ureters and 61% that AR reconstruction was accurate. CONCLUSION: This first AR device showed a satisfactory precision in the detection of ureters with a favorable opinion of surgeons. This surgical assistance system could be helpful in the performance of difficult procedures, for example in the case of patients, which have undergone multiple surgeries in the past.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a non-invasive surgical assistance based on augmented reality (AR) in the detection of ureters on animal model. METHOD: After an experimental prototyping step on two pigs to determine the optimal conditions for visualization of the ureter in AR, three pigs were operated three times at 1 week intervals. The intervention consisted of an identification of the ureter, with and without the assistance of AR. At the end of the intervention, a clip was placed on the AR-proposed ureter to evaluate its accuracy. By doing a cone beam computed tomography, we measured the distance between the contrasted ureter and the clips in the acquired volume. Thirteen videos were recorded, allowing subsequent evaluation of the clinical relevance of the device. RESULTS: The feasibility of the technique has been confirmed. The margin of error was 1.77 mm (± 1.56 mm) for ureter localization accuracy. In order to evaluate the perceived relevance and accuracy in the detection of AR-assisted ureter, 58 gynecological surgeons were shown the videos then questioned. Of the 754 responses obtained (13 videos × 58 surgeons), the ureter was identified in direct vision in 31.2% of cases versus 81.7% in AR (p value 3.62 × 10-7). When looking at pigs that had already had one or two operations, the ureter was identified in only 16% of cases with direct vision compared to 76.1% with AR (p-value 5.48 × 10-19). In addition, 67% of surgeons felt that AR allowed them to better identify the ureters and 61% that AR reconstruction was accurate. CONCLUSION: This first AR device showed a satisfactory precision in the detection of ureters with a favorable opinion of surgeons. This surgical assistance system could be helpful in the performance of difficult procedures, for example in the case of patients, which have undergone multiple surgeries in the past.
Entities:
Keywords:
Augmented reality; Clinical relevance; Laparoscopy; Modeling of ureters; Precision
Authors: William P Boyan; Daniel Lavy; Anthony Dinallo; Javier Otero; Annelie Roding; Dustin Hanos; Roy Dressner; Michael Arvanitis Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2017-02
Authors: Nicolas Bourdel; Toby Collins; Daniel Pizarro; Adrien Bartoli; David Da Ines; Bruno Perreira; Michel Canis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Elizabeth Curr; Ray Garry; Sabine van Voorst; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 13.828