Literature DB >> 31161291

Augmented reality in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: development, evaluation of accuracy and clinical relevance of a device useful to identify ureters during surgery.

Cherif Akladios1, Victor Gabriele2, Vincent Agnus3, Camille Martel-Billard1, Ralph Saadeh1, Olivier Garbin1, Lise Lecointre1, Jacques Marescaux3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a non-invasive surgical assistance based on augmented reality (AR) in the detection of ureters on animal model.
METHOD: After an experimental prototyping step on two pigs to determine the optimal conditions for visualization of the ureter in AR, three pigs were operated three times at 1 week intervals. The intervention consisted of an identification of the ureter, with and without the assistance of AR. At the end of the intervention, a clip was placed on the AR-proposed ureter to evaluate its accuracy. By doing a cone beam computed tomography, we measured the distance between the contrasted ureter and the clips in the acquired volume. Thirteen videos were recorded, allowing subsequent evaluation of the clinical relevance of the device.
RESULTS: The feasibility of the technique has been confirmed. The margin of error was 1.77 mm (± 1.56 mm) for ureter localization accuracy. In order to evaluate the perceived relevance and accuracy in the detection of AR-assisted ureter, 58 gynecological surgeons were shown the videos then questioned. Of the 754 responses obtained (13 videos × 58 surgeons), the ureter was identified in direct vision in 31.2% of cases versus 81.7% in AR (p value 3.62 × 10-7). When looking at pigs that had already had one or two operations, the ureter was identified in only 16% of cases with direct vision compared to 76.1% with AR (p-value 5.48 × 10-19). In addition, 67% of surgeons felt that AR allowed them to better identify the ureters and 61% that AR reconstruction was accurate.
CONCLUSION: This first AR device showed a satisfactory precision in the detection of ureters with a favorable opinion of surgeons. This surgical assistance system could be helpful in the performance of difficult procedures, for example in the case of patients, which have undergone multiple surgeries in the past.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Clinical relevance; Laparoscopy; Modeling of ureters; Precision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161291     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06855-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Volume delineation by fusion of fuzzy sets obtained from multiplanar tomographic images.

Authors:  S Vial; D Gibon; C Vasseur; J Rousseau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Transilluminating ureteric stents for preventing operative ureteric damage.

Authors:  J H Phipps; N J Tyrrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-01

3.  Deformable three-dimensional model architecture for interactive augmented reality in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Anant S Vemuri; Jungle Chi-Hsiang Wu; Kai-Che Liu; Hurng-Sheng Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Francesco Rubino; Mara Arenas; Didier Mutter; Luc Soler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Augmented reality techniques assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter.

Authors:  Jungle Chi-hsiang Wu; Mao-sheng Lin; Hurng-sheng Wu; Jack Kai-che Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Lighted ureteral stents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery; a five-year experience.

Authors:  William P Boyan; Daniel Lavy; Anthony Dinallo; Javier Otero; Annelie Roding; Dustin Hanos; Roy Dressner; Michael Arvanitis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Adam Ostrzenski; Bartholomew Radolinski; Katarzyna M Ostrzenska
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.347

8.  Augmented reality in gynecologic surgery: evaluation of potential benefits for myomectomy in an experimental uterine model.

Authors:  Nicolas Bourdel; Toby Collins; Daniel Pizarro; Adrien Bartoli; David Da Ines; Bruno Perreira; Michel Canis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Elizabeth Curr; Ray Garry; Sabine van Voorst; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery: a 12-year randomized trial in a community hospital.

Authors:  Mou-Tsy Chou; Chung-Jing Wang; Ray-Chang Lien
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-01-23
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 13.828

2.  Concept for Markerless 6D Tracking Employing Volumetric Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Matthias Schlüter; Lukas Glandorf; Martin Gromniak; Thore Saathoff; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.