Literature DB >> 18366319

Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations.

Matthias Baumhauer1, Marco Feuerstein, Hans-Peter Meinzer, J Rassweiler.   

Abstract

Despite rapid developments in the research areas of medical imaging, medical image processing, and robotics, the use of computer assistance in surgical routine is still limited to diagnostics, surgical planning, and interventions on mostly rigid structures. In order to establish a computer-aided workflow from diagnosis to surgical treatment and follow-up, several proposals for computer-assisted soft tissue interventions have been made in recent years. By means of different pre- and intraoperative information sources, such as surgical planning, intraoperative imaging, and tracking devices, surgical navigation systems aim to support surgeons in localizing anatomical targets, observing critical structures, and sparing healthy tissue. Current research in particular addresses the problem of organ shift and tissue deformation, and obstacles in communication between navigation system and surgeon. In this paper, we review computer-assisted navigation systems for soft tissue surgery. We concentrate on approaches that can be applied in endoscopic thoracic and abdominal surgery, because endoscopic surgery has special needs for image guidance due to limitations in perception. Furthermore, this paper informs the reader about new trends and technologies in the area of computer-assisted surgery. Finally, a balancing of the key challenges and possible benefits of endoscopic navigation refines the perspectives of this increasingly important discipline of computer-aided medical procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366319     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  23 in total

1.  Deformable three-dimensional model architecture for interactive augmented reality in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Anant S Vemuri; Jungle Chi-Hsiang Wu; Kai-Che Liu; Hurng-Sheng Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery: what is beyond the robot?

Authors:  Salvatore Micali; Giovannalberto Pini; Dogu Teber; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Stefano De Stefani; Giampaolo Bianchi; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoscopic ultrasound: a survey of its current and future use, requirements, and integration with navigation technology.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Anna Rethy; Thomas Langø; Tormod Selbekk; Brynjulf Ystgaard; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes; Ronald Mårvik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Toward real-time remote processing of laparoscopic video.

Authors:  Zahra Ronaghi; Edward B Duffy; David M Kwartowitz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-12-14

Review 5.  Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas Langø; Sinara Vijayan; Anna Rethy; Cecilie Våpenstad; Ole Vegard Solberg; Ronald Mårvik; Gjermund Johnsen; Toril N Hernes
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Detection and modelling of contacts in explicit finite-element simulation of soft tissue biomechanics.

Authors:  S F Johnsen; Z A Taylor; L Han; Y Hu; M J Clarkson; D J Hawkes; S Ourselin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  [Navigation in urological surgery: Possibilities and limits of current techniques].

Authors:  T Simpfendörfer; G Hatiboglu; B A Hadaschik; E Wild; L Maier-Hein; M-C Rassweiler; J Rassweiler; M Hohenfellner; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Armin Kolb; Matthias Gondan; Boris A Radeleff; Anja Schaible; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Towards automated visual flexible endoscope navigation.

Authors:  Nanda van der Stap; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robust augmented reality guidance with fluorescent markers in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther Wild; Dogu Teber; Daniel Schmid; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Michael Müller; Ann-Christin Baranski; Hannes Kenngott; Klaus Kopka; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.