Literature DB >> 22732829

Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Jing Guo1, Zhen Liu, Feng Lv, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Xing Zhang, Xiaolong Lin, Xu Sun, Yong Qiu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies had shown that sagittal spinal and pelvic morphology may be associated with the development and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but the predictive value of initial spinal and pelvic morphology on the curve progression during brace treatment is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation between initial spinopelvic morphology and the risk of curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Milwaukee brace.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2007, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (single thoracic curve with apex at or above T8) was treated with the Milwaukee brace in 60 girls. Initial standing, full-length lateral radiographs were made and seven sagittal radiographic parameters of spinal and pelvic alignment were measured. Patients were followed until skeletal maturity or progression of Cobb angle >45°. The progression of curve was defined as an increase of Cobb angle ≥6° at final follow-up or progression to surgery during brace treatment.
RESULTS: The 45 patients (75.0 %) who had successful control of curve progression were initially significantly more skeletally mature (higher mean Risser sign) than the 15 patients (25.0 %) who had curve progression. The initial mean Cobb angle was similar between the stable and progressed groups. The mean pelvic tilt, T1-spinopelvic inclination and T9-spinopelvic inclination angles were significantly greater in the stable group than in the progressed group and these three angles were independent predictors for curve progression during brace treatment. There were no significant differences between the stable and progressed groups in initial mean pelvic incidence, sacral slope, thoracic kyphosis or lumbar lordosis angles. Pre-bracing pelvic tilt ≤-0.5° was strongly predictive and T1-spinopelvic inclination ≤3.5° was moderately predictive of curve progression during the Milwaukee brace treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Initial pelvic tilt and spinopelvic inclination angles may predict the curve progression and treatment outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Milwaukee brace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732829      PMCID: PMC3463696          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2409-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

1.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Eric Berthonnaud; John R Dimar; Randal R Betz; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; P Guigui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity.

Authors:  W P Bunnell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D E Katz; A A Durrani
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth.

Authors:  X Guo; W W Chau; Y L Chan; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

6.  Factors determining the final outcome of treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the Boston brace: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Veerle Vijvermans; Guy Fabry; Jos Nijs
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  P N Soucacos; K Zacharis; J Gelalis; K Soultanis; N Kalos; A Beris; T Xenakis; E O Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  New prognostic factors to predict the final outcome of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S S Upadhyay; I W Nelson; E K Ho; L C Hsu; J C Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace.

Authors:  W A Carr; J H Moe; R B Winter; J E Lonstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  16 in total

1.  A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Jack Chau; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Tsz Ping Lam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  High-heeled-related alterations in the static sagittal profile of the spino-pelvic structure in young women.

Authors:  Min Dai; Xiaofeng Li; Xin Zhou; Yiqiang Hu; Qiang Luo; Song Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method.

Authors:  Rui Zheng; Doug Hill; Douglas Hedden; Marc Moreau; Sarah Southon; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with congenital scoliosis, and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Hassan Ghandhari; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Mir Bahram Safari; Ebrahim Ameri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Head to pelvis alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients both in and out of brace.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Isabelle Courtois; Eric Ebermeyer; Raphael Pietton; Houssam Bouloussa; Raphael Vialle; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Classification system of the sagittal standing alignment in young adolescent girls.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Barbara Cagnie; Pascal Coorevits; Andry Vleeming; Guy Vanderstraeten; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Factors relating to curve progression in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Yijun Yang; Xiaoqian Dang; Li Zhao; Juan Ren; Ligen Zhang; Jianzhong Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Evaluation of demographic factors affecting predictability of the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in healthy adolescents.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Hongda Bao; Yong Qiu; Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Feng Zhu; Bangping Qian; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Very short-term effect of brace wearing on gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis girls.

Authors:  Philippe Mahaudens; Xavier Banse; Maryline Mousny; Maxime Raison; Christine Detrembleur
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Rib-vertebral angle measurements predict brace treatment outcome in Risser grade 0 and premenarchal girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Xu Sun; Qi Ding; Shifu Sha; Saihu Mao; Feng Zhu; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Bin Wang; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.