Literature DB >> 11679821

Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

D E Katz1, A A Durrani.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of 51 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with a Boston brace for curves ranging from 36 degrees to 45 degrees.
OBJECTIVES: To determine what radiographic or clinical observations may be predictive of outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with AIS who are braced for curves >35 degrees are less likely to respond to conservative treatment than patients of similar maturity with smaller curves.
METHODS: Skeletally immature patients with AIS with no history of prior treatment were treated with a Boston brace. Cobb angles, vertebral tilt angles, coronal decompensation, apical vertebral translation(s), apical vertebral rotation, lateral trunk shift, rib vertebral angle difference, pelvic tilt, and the lumbar pelvic relationship (LPR) were measured at brace prescription, initial in-brace, brace discontinuation, and follow-up.
RESULTS: At the time of brace discontinuation, 31 patients (61%) were judged treatment successes. With follow-up observation, an additional eight patients progressed beyond 5 degrees, and a total of 16 patients (31%) required surgical correction. Only patients with double curves were found to have radiographic values predictive of outcome. The LPR angle, the association between the thoracic curve vertebral tilt angles and the amount of in-brace correction of the Cobb angle, were significant predictors. A patient's reported wear schedule significantly influenced outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a double curve pattern in which the thoracic curve is >35 degrees and the LPR angle is >12 degrees are significantly more likely to demonstrate curve progression. In-brace correction for double curves of at least 25% and a patient's ability to wear the orthosis >18 hours/day significantly increased the likelihood of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679821     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  51 in total

1.  Lack of joint hypermobility increases the risk of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Gabe Haller; Hannah Zabriskie; Shelby Spehar; Timothy Kuensting; Xavier Bledsoe; Ali Syed; Christina A Gurnett; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Idiopathic scoliosis in Korean schoolchildren: a prospective screening study of over 1 million children.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A comparative study of axis-line-distance technique and Cobb method on assessing the curative effect on scoliosis.

Authors:  Jia-Wei He; Guang-Hui Bai; Xin-Jian Ye; Kun Liu; Zhi-Han Yan; Xian Zhang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Xing Huang; Zhi-Kang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire.

Authors:  Kenneth M C Cheung; Elaine Y L Cheng; Samantha C W Chan; Kelvin W K Yeung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Professional opinion concerning the effectiveness of bracing relative to observation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Melanie J Donnelly; Kevin F Spratt; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  [Compliance as a prognostic factor in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis].

Authors:  J Seifert; A Selle; C Flieger; K P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Predictive factors for brace treatment outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a best-evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Manon van den Bogaart; Barend J van Royen; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Marinus de Kleuver; Sayf S A Faraj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; N K Burra; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.