Hassan Ghandhari1, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi2, Mir Bahram Safari1, Ebrahim Ameri3. 1. Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Teaching Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 3. Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Teaching Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Drebrahimameri@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine whether the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle could estimate pelvic tilt (PT) in scoliotic and normal subjects. METHODS: One hundred nine subjects including 38 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), 35 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS), and 36 healthy individuals were studied. PT, as the angle between the lines connecting the midpoint of the sacral plate to the centroid of one acetabulum and the vertical plane, and the SFP angle, as the angle between the midpoint of the upper sacral endplate, the centroid of one acetabulum, and the upper midpoint of the pubic symphysis, were calculated on full-length lateral and anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. Correlations between PT and the SFP angle were investigated in each group. RESULTS: The three groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and the mean SFP angle. The mean PT, however, was significantly lower in healthy subjects compared to that in patients with AIS and CS. Significant and reverse correlations were present between PT and the SFP angle in all three groups (AIS: r = -0.32, p = 0.04, PT = 82.5 - average SFP angle; CS: r = -0.48, p = 0.003, PT = 95.41 - average SFP angle; healthy: r = -0.33, p = 0.04, PT = 88.95 - average SFP angle). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike two previous reports, the SFP angle correlated poorly to PT in this study, limiting its use as a suitable surrogate for PT in scoliotic and healthy subjects.
PURPOSE: To examine whether the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle could estimate pelvic tilt (PT) in scoliotic and normal subjects. METHODS: One hundred nine subjects including 38 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), 35 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS), and 36 healthy individuals were studied. PT, as the angle between the lines connecting the midpoint of the sacral plate to the centroid of one acetabulum and the vertical plane, and the SFP angle, as the angle between the midpoint of the upper sacral endplate, the centroid of one acetabulum, and the upper midpoint of the pubic symphysis, were calculated on full-length lateral and anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. Correlations between PT and the SFP angle were investigated in each group. RESULTS: The three groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and the mean SFP angle. The mean PT, however, was significantly lower in healthy subjects compared to that in patients with AIS and CS. Significant and reverse correlations were present between PT and the SFP angle in all three groups (AIS: r = -0.32, p = 0.04, PT = 82.5 - average SFP angle; CS: r = -0.48, p = 0.003, PT = 95.41 - average SFP angle; healthy: r = -0.33, p = 0.04, PT = 88.95 - average SFP angle). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike two previous reports, the SFP angle correlated poorly to PT in this study, limiting its use as a suitable surrogate for PT in scoliotic and healthy subjects.
Authors: Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Eric Berthonnaud; John R Dimar; Randal R Betz; Hubert Labelle Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen Glassman; Michael R Shainline Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Maziar Badii; Sonya Shin; William C Torreggiani; Bojana Jankovic; Paul Gustafson; Peter L Munk; John M Esdaile Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Vidyadhar V Upasani; John Tis; Tracey Bastrom; Jeff Pawelek; Michelle Marks; Baron Lonner; Alvin Crawford; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468