Literature DB >> 7604322

New prognostic factors to predict the final outcome of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

S S Upadhyay1, I W Nelson, E K Ho, L C Hsu, J C Leong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Eighty-five patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Milwaukee or thoracolumbosacral orthoses at The Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital were studied longitudinally at 4-6-month intervals until maturity for spinal curvature and vertebral rotation, or until termination of brace treatment for persons who experienced brace failure who went on to have surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To identify radiologic features so that it may be possible to predict outcome of brace treatment early on. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The structural curve with poor flexibility and large rotational prominence have been found to be associated with poor prognosis for brace treatment. However, early response to bracing for spinal deformity and its relationship to final outcome of brace treatment in a longitudinal study is not available in the literature.
METHODS: Vertebral rotation and Cobb angles measured from anteroposterior radiographs of the spine obtained before bracing and 1-2 months after bracing were found valuable for prediction. Changes in post-brace Cobb angle and vertebral rotation were considered as an increase or reduction only when there was an increase or reduction of minimum 5 degrees or more from their prebrace measurements.
RESULTS: Those patients who showed increase in vertebral rotation and/or in Cobb angle after brace application were shown to have progression of curves leading to brace failure in 93% of patients, and 79% of these required surgery. The patients with no change in both vertebral rotation and Cobb angle after bracing often experienced brace failure (69%). Two patients (15%) required surgery. The results show that reduction of both Cobb angle and vertebral rotation after application of a brace is a prognostic indicator for a good outcome (97%), and no patients required surgery. Most of the patients with lumbar scoliosis (91%) showed such reductions.
CONCLUSION: The findings show a strong association between changes in vertebral rotation and the Cobb angle after application of a brace and the final outcome. Reduction in both is indicative of a good outcome, whereas increase in one or both indicates brace failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7604322     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199503010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Lack of joint hypermobility increases the risk of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Gabe Haller; Hannah Zabriskie; Shelby Spehar; Timothy Kuensting; Xavier Bledsoe; Ali Syed; Christina A Gurnett; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Professional opinion concerning the effectiveness of bracing relative to observation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Melanie J Donnelly; Kevin F Spratt; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  [Compliance as a prognostic factor in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis].

Authors:  J Seifert; A Selle; C Flieger; K P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Initial Cobb angle reduction velocity following bracing as a new predictor for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saihu Mao; Benlong Shi; Leilei Xu; Zhiwei Wang; Alec Lik Hang Hung; Tsz Ping Lam; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Kwong Man Lee; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Chalmers; Lindsey Westover; Johith Jacob; Andreas Donauer; Vicky H Zhao; Eric C Parent; Marc J Moreau; James K Mahood; Douglas M Hedden; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Zhen Liu; Feng Lv; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Xing Zhang; Xiaolong Lin; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  How quantity and quality of brace wear affect the brace treatment outcomes for AIS.

Authors:  Edmond H M Lou; Douglas L Hill; Jim V Raso; Marc Moreau; Douglas Hedden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Archana Sangole; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.