Literature DB >> 22718258

Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.

Dovin Kiernan1, Matthew Ray, Timothy N Welsh.   

Abstract

The joint Simon effect (JSE) is a spatial-compatibility effect that emerges when two people complete complementary components of a Simon task. In typical JSE studies, two participants sit beside each other and perform go-no-go tasks in which they respond to one of two stimuli by pressing a button. According to the action co-representation account, JSEs emerge because each participant represents their partner's response in addition to their own, causing the same conflicts in processing that would occur if an individual responded to both stimuli (i.e., as in a two-choice task). Because the response buttons are typically in front of participants, however, an alternative explanation is that JSEs are the result of a dimensional overlap between target and response locations coded with respect to another salient object (e.g., the co-actor's effector). To contrast these hypotheses, the participants in the present study completed two-choice and joint Simon tasks in which they were asked to focus on generating an aftereffect in the space contralateral to their response. Hommel (Psychological Research 55:270-279, 1993) previously reported that, when participants completed a two-choice task under such effect-focused instructions, spatial-compatibility effects emerged that were based on the aftereffect location instead of the response location. Consistent with the co-representation account, the results of the present study were that an inverse aftereffect-based (i.e., not a response-location-based) compatibility effect was observed in both the two-choice and joint tasks. The overall pattern of results does not fit with the spatial-coding account and is discussed in the context of the extant JSE literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718258     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Response selection during a joint action task.

Authors:  Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04

3.  Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliott; J Greg Anson; Victoria Dhillon; Daniel J Weeks; James L Lyons; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Filomena Anelli; Roberto Nicoletti; Luciano Arcuri; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.

Authors:  Chia-Chin Tsai; Wen-Jui Kuo; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Influence of stimulus--response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task.

Authors:  Delia Guagnano; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Arrigo Umiltà
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-11-14

8.  Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Laura Higgins; Matthew Ray; Daniel J Weeks
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07

10.  How "social" is the social Simon effect?

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Bernhard Hommel; Lorenza S Colzato; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

2.  Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-08

3.  Individual differences in co-representation in three monkey species (Callithrix jacchus, Sapajus apella and Macaca tonkeana) in the joint Simon task: the role of social factors and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Fabia M Miss; Baptiste Sadoughi; Hélène Meunier; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Why don't guiding cues always guide in behavior chains?

Authors:  Alliston K Reid; Hannah F Rapport; Thien-An Le
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).

Authors:  Lydia Puffe; Kerstin Dittrich; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Joint response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Thomas Dolk; Wolfgang Prinz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

7.  When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.

Authors:  René Michel; Jens Bölte; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-17

8.  Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Markus Raab
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-11-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.