Literature DB >> 24101572

Joint response-effect compatibility.

Roland Pfister1, Thomas Dolk, Wolfgang Prinz, Wilfried Kunde.   

Abstract

When performing jointly on a task, human agents are assumed to represent their coactor's share of this task, and research in various joint action paradigms has focused on representing the coactor's stimulus-response assignments. Here we show that the response-effect (R-E) contingencies exploited by a coactor also affect performance, and thus might be represented as if they were used by oneself. Participants performed an R-E compatibility task, with keypresses producing spatially compatible or incompatible action effects. We did not observe any R-E compatibility effects when the task was performed in isolation (individual go-no-go). By contrast, small but reliable R-E compatibility effects emerged when the same task was performed in a joint setting. These results indicate that the knowledge of a coactor's R-E contingencies can influence whether self-produced action effects are used for one's own motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24101572     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0528-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  39 in total

1.  Effective rotations: action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Roland Pfister; Michael A Crognale; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-01-23

2.  Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; Annelie Rothe; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Within- and between-nervous-system inhibition of return: observation is as good as performance.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; James Lyons; Daniel J Weeks; J Greg Anson; Romeo Chua; Jocelyn Mendoza; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  Mental imagery yields stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  M Tlauka; F P McKenna
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-03

5.  Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

7.  Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliott; J Greg Anson; Victoria Dhillon; Daniel J Weeks; James L Lyons; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Dorit Wenke; Rico Fischer; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-18

9.  Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; Thomas Dolk; Annelie Rothe-Wulf; Karl Christoph Klauer; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Individual differences in co-representation in three monkey species (Callithrix jacchus, Sapajus apella and Macaca tonkeana) in the joint Simon task: the role of social factors and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Fabia M Miss; Baptiste Sadoughi; Hélène Meunier; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?

Authors:  Romy Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-09

3.  Motor interference in interactive contexts.

Authors:  Eris Chinellato; Umberto Castiello; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Spontaneous adaptation explains why people act faster when being imitated.

Authors:  Jarosław R Lelonkiewicz; Chiara Gambi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Evidence for a dyadic motor plan in joint action.

Authors:  Lucia Maria Sacheli; Elisa Arcangeli; Eraldo Paulesu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 7.  How and why do infants imitate? An ideomotor approach to social and imitative learning in infancy (and beyond).

Authors:  Markus Paulus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

8.  The joint flanker effect: less social than previously thought.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Bernhard Hommel; Wolfgang Prinz; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

9.  Neuroimaging of the joint Simon effect with believed biological and non-biological co-actors.

Authors:  Tanya Wen; Shulan Hsieh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Action and perception in social contexts: intentional binding for social action effects.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Martina Rieger; Dorit Wenke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.