Literature DB >> 25164938

Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.

Natalie Sebanz1, Guenther Knoblich.   

Abstract

Drawing on recent findings in the cognitive and neurosciences, this article discusses how people manage to predict each other's actions, which is fundamental for joint action. We explore how a common coding of perceived and performed actions may allow actors to predict the what, when, and where of others' actions. The "what" aspect refers to predictions about the kind of action the other will perform and to the intention that drives the action. The "when" aspect is critical for all joint actions requiring close temporal coordination. The "where" aspect is important for the online coordination of actions because actors need to effectively distribute a common space. We argue that although common coding of perceived and performed actions alone is not sufficient to enable one to engage in joint action, it provides a representational platform for integrating the actions of self and other. The final part of the paper considers links between lower-level processes like action simulation and higher-level processes like verbal communication and mental state attribution that have previously been at the focus of joint action research.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action simulation; Joint action; Joint attention; Mental state attribution; Mirror system; Perception-action links; Prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 25164938     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  145 in total

Review 1.  Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement.

Authors:  Raphaela Heesen; Emilie Genty; Federico Rossano; Klaus Zuberbühler; Adrian Bangerter
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Dorit Wenke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-17

3.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

5.  Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Mark A Atkinson; Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

6.  Humans are sensitive to attention control when predicting others' actions.

Authors:  Ana Pesquita; Craig S Chapman; James T Enns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence.

Authors:  Michael Villiger; Sanjay Chandrasekharan; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Luca F Ticini; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Recall of observed actions modulates the end-state comfort effect just like recall of one's own actions.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Socially triggered negative affect impairs performance in simple cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Svenja Böttcher; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.