Literature DB >> 17937970

Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?

Timothy N Welsh1, Laura Higgins, Matthew Ray, Daniel J Weeks.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the observation of another person's action affects the behavior of the observer because the observation of action leads to the excitation of similar response codes in the observer. It is unknown, however, if one must witness the action or if it is sufficient for one to believe that the other agent is responding for response co-representation to occur. To this end, participants in the present study performed a joint spatial-compatibility task with a confederate when: (1) the confederate sat beside the participant; and, (2) the confederate left the room and told the participant that they would continue to perform their component of the task on a networked computer in another room. Even though participants believed that the confederate performed the task in another room, joint spatial-compatibility was only observed when the confederate was present. These results reveal that the actions of another person may only be represented by the observer when the observer is able to witness a portion of the action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17937970     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  32 in total

1.  The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Francesca Ciardo; Simone Panajoli; Luisa Lugli; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contextual determinants of the social-transfer-of-learning effect.

Authors:  Nadia Milanese; Cristina Iani; Natalie Sebanz; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

5.  My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.

Authors:  Pamela Baess; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Jarrod Blinch; Elizabeth M Connors; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  EEG correlates of impaired self-other integration during joint-task performance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J de la Asuncion; C Bervoets; M Morrens; B Sabbe; E R A De Bruijn
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; En Fu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

9.  No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; David Melcher; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-29

10.  Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.

Authors:  Anna Stenzel; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.