Literature DB >> 22717800

Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes.

N H Bhayani1, A A Kurian, A M Sharata, K M Reavis, C M Dunst, L L Swanstrom.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Incarceration and obstruction of an intrathoracic stomach are potentially devastating complications of paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Gastric decompression and resuscitation are important elements of preoperative management of acutely presenting PEH. The optimal time for surgical repair after decompression is unknown. We hypothesized that in obstructed PEH, early surgery may improve outcomes.
METHODS: From the 2005-2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database, we selected PEH repairs with a diagnosis of obstruction. Patients were divided by time to surgery: ≤1 day of admission (early) or >1 day (interval). Outcomes were mortality and morbidity. Multivariable regression controlled for age and cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
RESULTS: Of 224 patients, 149 (67%) were early and 75 (33%) were interval, with mean 3.6 days. Repairs were 89% transabdominal, 9% included fundoplication, and 18% gastrostomy. Early and interval groups experienced similar morbidity 23 versus 31% (p = 0.2) and mortality 5.4 versus 4% (p = 0.7). Pulmonary, wound, or VTE complications were equivalent. Sepsis was less (2.7 vs. 13%, p = 0.002) and length of stay was shorter (5 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001) for early vs. interval patients. On adjusted analysis, the early group had an 80% reduction in sepsis (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.6, p = 0.005). Odds of overall or other morbidity or mortality were statistically similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who required emergency surgery for PEH have disease complicated by strangulation, perforation, bleeding, or sepsis. Emergency surgery for PEH repair is inherently high-risk and preoperative resuscitation and decompression is critical. In our analysis, patients with an obstructed PEH had less postoperative sepsis and fewer days in the hospital if surgery was performed within the first hospital day. However, there was no difference in mortality between early and delayed treatment. Deferring surgery for resuscitation permits optimization, but prolonged delay may worsen patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22717800     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2436-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Tommy A Brown; Robert M Rush; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Noopur Gangopadhyay; Juan M Perrone; Nathaniel J Soper; Brent D Matthews; J Christopher Eagon; Mary E Klingensmith; Margaret M Frisella; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients.

Authors:  D B Skinner; R H Belsey
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Review of outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Sam Mehta; Alex Boddy; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Eero I Sihvo; Jarmo A Salo; Jari V Räsänen; Tuomo K Rantanen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  A national comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Jonah J Stulberg; John Byrnes; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians.

Authors:  Benjamin K Poulose; Christine Gosen; Jeffrey M Marks; Leena Khaitan; Michael J Rosen; Raymond P Onders; Joseph A Trunzo; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  P R Schauer; S Ikramuddin; R H McLaughlin; T O Graham; A Slivka; K K Lee; W H Schraut; J D Luketich
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; G Scott Gazelle; David W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A population-based analysis of emergent vs. elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach.

Authors:  Marek Polomsky; Rui Hu; Boris Sepesi; Matthew O'Connor; Xing Qui; Daniel P Raymond; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  10 in total

1.  Acute Vs. Elective Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Endoscopic Gastric Decompression Allows Semi-Elective Surgery in a Majority of Acute Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Wirsching; Moustapha A El Lakis; Kamran Mohiuddin; Agostino Pozzi; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  "Acute intrathoracic stomach!" How should we deal with complicated type IV paraesophageal hernias?

Authors:  G Köhler; O O Koch; S A Antoniou; K Emmanuel; R Pointner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hassanain Jassim; Johnathan T Seligman; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Goldblatt; Andrew Kastenmeier; James Wallace; Heather S Zhao; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review.

Authors:  Vanitha Vasudevan; Ryan Reusche; Erek Nelson; Srinivas Kaza
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-03

6.  Large hiatus hernia: time for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Kheman Rajkomar; Christophe R Berney
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.030

7.  The impact of frailty on outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Chimukangara; Matthew J Frelich; Matthew E Bosler; Lisa E Rein; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective.

Authors:  David M Parker; Amrit Rambhajan; Katherine Johanson; Anna Ibele; Jon D Gabrielsen; Anthony T Petrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Venous thromboembolism in benign esophageal surgery patients: potential cost effectiveness of Caprini risk stratification.

Authors:  Sean A Perez; Shriya B Reddy; Amanda Meister; Emma Pinjic; Kei Suzuki; Virginia R Litle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic Fundoplication for Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernias.

Authors:  Massimo Arcerito; Martin G Perez; Harpreet Kaur; Kenneth M Annoreno; John T Moon
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.