BACKGROUND: As the life expectancy in the United States continues to increase, more elderly, sometimes frail patients present with sub-acute surgical conditions such as a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia (PEH). While the outcomes of PEH repair have improved largely due to the proliferation of laparoscopic surgery, there is still a defined rate of morbidity and mortality. We sought to characterize the outcomes of both elective and emergent PEH repair using a large population-based data set. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for primary ICD-9 codes associated with PEH repair (years 2006-2008). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of a pre-identified complication. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for complications and mortality following both elective and emergent PEH repair. RESULTS: A total of 8,462 records in the data, representing 41,723 patients in the US undergoing PEH repair in the study interval, were identified. Of these procedures, 74.2% was elective and 42.4% was laparoscopic. The overall complication and mortality rates were 20.8 and 1.1%, respectively. Emergent repair was associated with a higher rate of morbidity (33.4 vs. 16.5%, p < 0.001) and mortality (3.2 vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001) than elective repair. Emergent repair patients were more likely to be male, were older, and more likely to be minority. Logistic modeling revealed that younger age, elective case status, and a laparoscopic approach were independently associated with a lower probability of complications and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing emergent PEH repair in the United States tend to be older, more likely a racial minority, and less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Elective repair, younger age, and a laparoscopic approach are associated with improved outcomes. Considering all of the above, we recommend that patients consider elective repair with a surgeon experienced in the laparoscopic approach, especially when symptoms related to the hernia are present.
BACKGROUND: As the life expectancy in the United States continues to increase, more elderly, sometimes frail patients present with sub-acute surgical conditions such as a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia (PEH). While the outcomes of PEH repair have improved largely due to the proliferation of laparoscopic surgery, there is still a defined rate of morbidity and mortality. We sought to characterize the outcomes of both elective and emergent PEH repair using a large population-based data set. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for primary ICD-9 codes associated with PEH repair (years 2006-2008). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of a pre-identified complication. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for complications and mortality following both elective and emergent PEH repair. RESULTS: A total of 8,462 records in the data, representing 41,723 patients in the US undergoing PEH repair in the study interval, were identified. Of these procedures, 74.2% was elective and 42.4% was laparoscopic. The overall complication and mortality rates were 20.8 and 1.1%, respectively. Emergent repair was associated with a higher rate of morbidity (33.4 vs. 16.5%, p < 0.001) and mortality (3.2 vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001) than elective repair. Emergent repair patients were more likely to be male, were older, and more likely to be minority. Logistic modeling revealed that younger age, elective case status, and a laparoscopic approach were independently associated with a lower probability of complications and mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing emergent PEH repair in the United States tend to be older, more likely a racial minority, and less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Elective repair, younger age, and a laparoscopic approach are associated with improved outcomes. Considering all of the above, we recommend that patients consider elective repair with a surgeon experienced in the laparoscopic approach, especially when symptoms related to the hernia are present.
Authors: Hude Quan; Bing Li; L Duncan Saunders; Gerry A Parsons; Carolyn I Nilsson; Arif Alibhai; William A Ghali Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Noopur Gangopadhyay; Juan M Perrone; Nathaniel J Soper; Brent D Matthews; J Christopher Eagon; Mary E Klingensmith; Margaret M Frisella; L Michael Brunt Journal: Surgery Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Benjamin K Poulose; Christine Gosen; Jeffrey M Marks; Leena Khaitan; Michael J Rosen; Raymond P Onders; Joseph A Trunzo; Jeffrey L Ponsky Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Anirban Gupta; David Chang; Kimberley E Steele; Michael A Schweitzer; Jerome Lyn-Sue; Anne O Lidor Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marek Polomsky; Rui Hu; Boris Sepesi; Matthew O'Connor; Xing Qui; Daniel P Raymond; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Andrea Wirsching; Moustapha A El Lakis; Kamran Mohiuddin; Agostino Pozzi; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Vernissia Tam; James D Luketich; Daniel G Winger; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Ryan M Levy; Neil A Christie; Omar Awais; Manisha R Shende; Katie S Nason Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Samuel Torres Landa; Jordana B Cohen; Robert A Swendiman; Chris Wirtalla; Daniel T Dempsey; Kristoffel R Dumon Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kathleen L Simon; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould; Heather S Zhao; Aniko Szabo; Matthew I Goldblatt Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Munyaradzi Chimukangara; Matthew J Frelich; Matthew E Bosler; Lisa E Rein; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Lindsey N Clark; Melissa C Helm; Rana Higgins; Kathleen Lak; Andrew Kastenmeier; Tammy Kindel; Matthew Goldblatt; Jon C Gould Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 4.584