Literature DB >> 33492505

Venous thromboembolism in benign esophageal surgery patients: potential cost effectiveness of Caprini risk stratification.

Sean A Perez1, Shriya B Reddy1, Amanda Meister2, Emma Pinjic2, Kei Suzuki2, Virginia R Litle3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) stratifies surgical patients for prescription of post-discharge extended heparin prophylaxis to reduce post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. The average cost for treatment of a VTE event is $15,123. The 30-day post-operative VTE rate after benign esophageal procedures is < 0.8% per the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. We hypothesized that the financial cost of selective extended prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for benign esophageal disease would exceed the cost of treating these rare events and therefore use of risk stratification for extended prophylaxis would not be beneficial.
METHODS: All patients undergoing operations for benign esophageal pathology from July 2014 to May 2019 were reviewed. Patients designated as moderate or high risk for VTE were prescribed a 10- or 30-day post-operative course of extended prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). VTE and adverse bleeding events were recorded for the 60-day post-operative period. The cost of LMWH was provided by the institution pharmacy.
RESULTS: Records from 154 patients were eligible for review. Caprini RAM was used for all patients with the following distribution of risk categories: low = 64.9% (100/154); moderate = 31.8% (49/154); and high = 3.2% (5/154). The average cost of extended prophylaxis at discharge for the moderate-risk group was $121.23, while the high-risk group was $446.46. There were no 60-day VTE or adverse bleeding events recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing surgical therapy were at low risk of post-operative VTE event, with only 35% requiring extended VTE prophylaxis at time of discharge. When compared with the average cost of treatment for a VTE event, the cost of extended prophylaxis per patient in moderate or high-risk groups is substantially lower. In the era of cost-containment, risk stratification and extended prophylaxis may reduce healthcare costs and warrant future investigations.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign; Cost; Esophagus; Risk stratification; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492505     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08269-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Steven H Bailey; George Dreszer; Christine Fisher Wachtman; Justin W Zumsteg; Reda M Jaber; Jennifer B Hamill; Keith M Hume; J Peter Rubin; Peter C Neligan; Loree K Kalliainen; Ronald E Hoxworth; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Direct medical costs of venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospital readmission rates: an administrative claims analysis from 30 managed care organizations.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Jay Lin
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

3.  Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; David A Garcia; Sherry M Wren; Paul J Karanicolas; Juan I Arcelus; John A Heit; Charles M Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Reducing postoperative venous thromboembolism complications with a standardized risk-stratified prophylaxis protocol and mobilization program.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; Pamela Rosenkranz; David McAneny
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maria M Fernandez; Susan Hogue; Ronald Preblick; Winghan Jacqueline Kwong
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-08-28

6.  Validation of a venous thromboembolism risk assessment model in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  William Stroud; Jenny M Whitworth; Margaret Miklic; Kellie E Schneider; Michael A Finan; Jennifer Scalici; Eddie Reed; Lisa Bazzett-Matabele; J Michael Straughn; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Cost effectiveness of venous thromboembolism pharmacological prophylaxis in total hip and knee replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alok Kapoor; Warren Chuang; Nila Radhakrishnan; Kenneth J Smith; Dan Berlowitz; Jodi B Segal; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Caprini Risk Model Decreases Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Thoracic Surgery Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Helene M Sterbling; Amy K Rosen; Krista J Hachey; Niru S Vellanki; Philip D Hewes; Sowmya R Rao; Emma Pinjic; Hiran C Fernando; Virginia R Litle
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method.

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Hsou Mei Hu; Peter K Henke; Thomas W Wakefield; Darrell A Campbell; Joseph A Caprini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  John A Heit; Frederick A Spencer; Richard H White
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.