Literature DB >> 9926809

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia.

P R Schauer1, S Ikramuddin, R H McLaughlin, T O Graham, A Slivka, K K Lee, W H Schraut, J D Luketich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR) is feasible, but no direct comparisons with the standard open paraesophageal hernia repair (OPHR) have been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term outcome of LPHR versus OPHR at a single institution.
METHODS: The operative and postoperative courses of 95 consecutive patients undergoing open or laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) were retrospectively reviewed, and outcomes of LPHR versus OPHR were compared.
RESULTS: PEH was associated with advanced age and significant comorbidity. Although the operative time was increased for LPHR, there was a significant reduction in blood loss, intensive care unit stay, ileus, hospital stay, and overall morbidity associated with LPHR compared with OPHR.
CONCLUSIONS: PEH is associated with significant comorbidity that increases the operative risk. Short-term outcomes for LPHR are superior to OPHR, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach is the preferred approach to paraesophageal hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9926809     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00272-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  61 in total

1.  The laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; James D Luketich; Bart P L Witteman; Ryan M Levy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Evaluation of fibrin sealant for biologic mesh fixation at the hiatus in a porcine model.

Authors:  David M Krpata; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Karem C Harth; Melissa S Phillips; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Fast-track giant paraoesophageal hernia repair using a simplified laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  Jacob Rosenberg; Bo Jacobsen; Anders Fischer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature.

Authors:  J M Johnson; A M Carbonell; B J Carmody; M K Jamal; J W Maher; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; F Holzinger; T Kapp; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Enterocutaneous fistula associated with ePTFE mesh: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Foda; M A Carlson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Katie S Nason; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Blair A Jobe; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair--a case-control study.

Authors:  Tobias Gehrig; A Mehrabi; L Fischer; H Kenngott; U Hinz; C N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Severe complication of laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Nico Zügel; Reinhold A Lang; Martin Kox; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.