Literature DB >> 20033732

A population-based analysis of emergent vs. elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach.

Marek Polomsky1, Rui Hu, Boris Sepesi, Matthew O'Connor, Xing Qui, Daniel P Raymond, Virginia R Litle, Carolyn E Jones, Thomas J Watson, Jeffrey H Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large-scale, population-based analyses of the demographics, management, and healthcare resource utilization of patients with an intrathoracic stomach are largely unknown, an issue which has become more important with the aging of the population. Our objective was to understand the magnitude of the problem and to assess clinical outcomes and hospital costs in elective and emergent admissions of patients with an intrathoracic stomach in a large population-based study.
METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative database was queried for primary ICD-9-CM codes 553.3 and 552.3 in patients 18 years or older; 4858 hospital admissions were identified over a 5-year period (2002-2006). Database variables included age, gender, race, type of admission, operative intervention, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost.
RESULTS: Approximately 1000 patients are admitted to the hospital each year with primary diagnosis of intrathoracic stomach, an estimated 52 per 1 million of the population in New York State. Over half of those (53%) were emergent admissions. Interestingly, the majority of emergent admissions (66%) were discharged before any surgical intervention. Patients admitted emergently were older (68.0 vs. 62.1 years, p < 0.0001) and more likely African-American (12% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). Compared to elective admissions, emergent admissions had higher mortality (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (LOS) (7.3 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.0001), and higher cost ($28,484 vs. $24,069, p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent surgery, emergent admissions had higher mortality (5.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001), greater LOS (13.1 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.0001), and higher costs ($55,460 vs. $24,760, p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated age, emergent presentation, and operative admission as independent predictors for hospital mortality, LOS, and cost (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Strikingly, more than half of admissions for intrathoracic stomach were emergent. Emergent admissions had higher mortality, longer LOS, and higher cost than elective admissions. These data support consideration of early elective repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033732     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0755-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Dave R Lal; Carlos A Pellegrini; Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Massive hiatal hernias: the anatomic basis of repair.

Authors:  N K Altorki; D Yankelevitz; D B Skinner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency.

Authors:  L D Hill
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients.

Authors:  D B Skinner; R H Belsey
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Eero I Sihvo; Jarmo A Salo; Jari V Räsänen; Tuomo K Rantanen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians.

Authors:  Benjamin K Poulose; Christine Gosen; Jeffrey M Marks; Leena Khaitan; Michael J Rosen; Raymond P Onders; Joseph A Trunzo; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia: surgery for all ages.

Authors:  M T Hallissey; D A Ratliff; J G Temple
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  An approach to the management of para-oesophageal hiatus hernias.

Authors:  P J Treacy; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1987-11

9.  Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; G Scott Gazelle; David W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Intrathoracic stomach. Presentation and results of operation.

Authors:  M S Allen; V F Trastek; C Deschamps; P C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  17 in total

1.  Acute Vs. Elective Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Endoscopic Gastric Decompression Allows Semi-Elective Surgery in a Majority of Acute Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Wirsching; Moustapha A El Lakis; Kamran Mohiuddin; Agostino Pozzi; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  "Acute intrathoracic stomach!" How should we deal with complicated type IV paraesophageal hernias?

Authors:  G Köhler; O O Koch; S A Antoniou; K Emmanuel; R Pointner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Does the addition of fundoplication to repair the intra-thoracic stomach improve quality of life?

Authors:  Wendy Jo Svetanoff; Pradeep Pallati; Kalyana Nandipati; Tommy Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hassanain Jassim; Johnathan T Seligman; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Goldblatt; Andrew Kastenmeier; James Wallace; Heather S Zhao; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bowel in Chest: Type IV Hiatal Hernia.

Authors:  William Krause; Jennifer Roberts; Romel J Garcia-Montilla
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-06

7.  Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes.

Authors:  N H Bhayani; A A Kurian; A M Sharata; K M Reavis; C M Dunst; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged?

Authors:  Marek Polomsky; Carolyn E Jones; Boris Sepesi; Matthew O'Connor; Alexi Matousek; Rui Hu; Daniel P Raymond; Virginia R Litle; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A clinical prediction rule for perioperative mortality and major morbidity after laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Nikiforos Ballian; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Dan Winger; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Age-related outcomes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Is there a "too old" for antireflux surgery?

Authors:  Alex Addo; Zachary Sanford; Andrew Broda; H Reza Zahiri; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.