Literature DB >> 25091496

Adaptive fixation in two-locus models of stabilizing selection and genetic drift.

Andreas Wollstein1, Wolfgang Stephan1.   

Abstract

The relationship between quantitative genetics and population genetics has been studied for nearly a century, almost since the existence of these two disciplines. Here we ask to what extent quantitative genetic models in which selection is assumed to operate on a polygenic trait predict adaptive fixations that may lead to footprints in the genome (selective sweeps). We study two-locus models of stabilizing selection (with and without genetic drift) by simulations and analytically. For symmetric viability selection we find that ∼16% of the trajectories may lead to fixation if the initial allele frequencies are sampled from the neutral site-frequency spectrum and the effect sizes are uniformly distributed. However, if the population is preadapted when it undergoes an environmental change (i.e., sits in one of the equilibria of the model), the fixation probability decreases dramatically. In other two-locus models with general viabilities or an optimum shift, the proportion of adaptive fixations may increase to >24%. Similarly, genetic drift leads to a higher probability of fixation. The predictions of alternative quantitative genetics models, initial conditions, and effect-size distributions are also discussed.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  pleiotropy; polygenic adaptation; stabilizing selection; two-locus model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25091496      PMCID: PMC4196621          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.168567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  40 in total

1.  The two-locus model of Gaussian stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Martin Willensdorfer; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Pleuni S Pennings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Stability and response of polygenic traits to stabilizing selection and mutation.

Authors:  Harold P de Vladar; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  9 in total

1.  Rapid Adaptation of a Polygenic Trait After a Sudden Environmental Shift.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Response of Polygenic Traits Under Stabilizing Selection and Mutation When Loci Have Unequal Effects.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Inferring positive selection in humans from genomic data.

Authors:  Andreas Wollstein; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Polygenic adaptation: From sweeps to subtle frequency shifts.

Authors:  Ilse Höllinger; Pleuni S Pennings; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 6.020

Review 6.  Polygenic Adaptation in a Population of Finite Size.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan; Sona John
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Using singleton densities to detect recent selection in Bos taurus.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Nina Aagaard Poulsen; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2021-11-22

8.  Selective Sweeps and Polygenic Adaptation Drive Local Adaptation along Moisture and Temperature Gradients in Natural Populations of Coast Redwood and Giant Sequoia.

Authors:  Amanda R De La Torre; Manoj K Sekhwal; David B Neale
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Genetic architecture and selective sweeps after polygenic adaptation to distant trait optima.

Authors:  Markus G Stetter; Kevin Thornton; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.