Literature DB >> 20452572

Phasic nucleus accumbens dopamine release encodes effort- and delay-related costs.

Jeremy J Day1, Joshua L Jones, R Mark Wightman, Regina M Carelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal decision-making requires that organisms correctly evaluate both the costs and benefits of potential choices. Dopamine transmission within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) has been heavily implicated in reward-learning and decision-making, but it is unclear how dopamine release might contribute to decisions that involve costs.
METHODS: Cost-based decision-making was examined in rats trained to associate visual cues with either immediate or delayed rewards (delay manipulation) or low-effort or high-effort rewards (effort manipulation). After training, dopamine concentration within the NAc was monitored on a rapid time scale with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.
RESULTS: Animals exhibited a preference for immediate or low-effort rewards over delayed or high-effort rewards of equal magnitude. Reward-predictive cues but not response execution or reward delivery evoked increases in NAc dopamine concentration. When only one response option was available, cue-evoked dopamine release reflected the value of the future reward, with larger increases in dopamine signaling higher-value rewards. In contrast, when both options were presented simultaneously, dopamine signaled the better of two options, regardless of the future choice.
CONCLUSIONS: Phasic dopamine signals in the NAc reflect two different types of reward cost and encode potential rather than chosen value under choice situations. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452572      PMCID: PMC2907444          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  18 in total

1.  Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Christopher D Fiorillo; Philippe N Tobler; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action.

Authors:  Genela Morris; Alon Nevet; David Arkadir; Eilon Vaadia; Hagai Bergman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Dopamine antagonists alter response allocation but do not suppress appetite for food in rats: contrast between the effects of SKF 83566, raclopride, and fenfluramine on a concurrent choice task.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M N Arizzi; M D Sandoval; K M Cervone; J E Aberman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Delay discounting in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin A Heerey; Benjamin M Robinson; Robert P McMahon; James M Gold
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.871

7.  Anhedonia or anergia? Effects of haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion on instrumental response selection in a T-maze cost/benefit procedure.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M S Cousins; S Bucher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-18       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Temporal reward discounting in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the contribution of symptom domains, reward magnitude, and session length.

Authors:  Anouk Scheres; Chandra Tontsch; Allison Lee Thoeny; Antonia Kaczkurkin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The temporal precision of reward prediction in dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Christopher D Fiorillo; William T Newsome; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  91 in total

Review 1.  Components and characteristics of the dopamine reward utility signal.

Authors:  William R Stauffer; Armin Lak; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Endocannabinoids shape accumbal encoding of cue-motivated behavior via CB1 receptor activation in the ventral tegmentum.

Authors:  Erik B Oleson; Michael V Beckert; Joshua T Morra; Carien S Lansink; Roger Cachope; Rehab A Abdullah; Amy L Loriaux; Dustin Schetters; Tommy Pattij; Mitchell F Roitman; Aron H Lichtman; Joseph F Cheer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Emotional content impacts how executive function ability relates to willingness to wait and to work for reward.

Authors:  Katherine S F Damme; Nicholas J Kelley; Meghan E Quinn; James E Glazer; Iris Ka-Yi Chat; Katherine S Young; Robin Nusslock; Richard Zinbarg; Susan Bookheimer; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Contributions of nucleus accumbens dopamine to cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Adrina Kocharian; Dan P Covey; David M Lovinger; Joseph F Cheer; Yolanda Mateo; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Hypocretin receptor 1 blockade preferentially reduces high effort responding for cocaine without promoting sleep.

Authors:  Zachary D Brodnik; David L Bernstein; Courtney D Prince; Rodrigo A España
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Risk preference following adolescent alcohol use is associated with corrupted encoding of costs but not rewards by mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Nicholas A Nasrallah; Jeremy J Clark; Annie L Collins; Christina A Akers; Paul E Phillips; Ilene L Bernstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contributions of the nucleus accumbens and its subregions to different aspects of risk-based decision making.

Authors:  Colin M Stopper; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The impact of motivation on cognitive performance in an animal model of the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Vanessa Winiger; Kerin K Higa; Julia B Kahn; Eric R Kandel; Peter D Balsam; Eleanor H Simpson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Monica M Arnold; Jerylin O Gan; Mark E Walton; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sex differences in a rat model of risky decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Markie L Willis; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.