Literature DB >> 22170625

Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues.

James E McCutcheon1, Jeff A Beeler, Mitchell F Roitman.   

Abstract

Cues that have been paired with food evoke dopamine in nucleus accumbens (NAc) and drive approach behavior. This cue-evoked dopamine signaling could contribute to overconsumption of food. One manner in which individuals try to restrict caloric intake is through the consumption of foods containing artificial (non-nutritive) sweeteners. We were interested in whether cues paired with a non-nutritive sweetener (saccharin) would evoke similar dopamine release as cues paired with a nutritive sweetener (sucrose). We trained food-restricted rats to associate distinct cues with sucrose or saccharin pellets. In the first group of rats, training sessions with each pellet took place on different days, maximizing the opportunity for rats to detect nutritional differences. After training, voltammetry recordings in NAc core revealed that sucrose cues evoked greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin cues. In a second group of rats, on each training day, sucrose and saccharin pellets were presented in pseudorandom order within the same session, to mask nutritional differences. In this condition, the difference in dopamine between sucrose and saccharin cues was attenuated, but not abolished. These results suggest that sucrose-paired cues will more powerfully motivate behavior than saccharin-paired cues. The differing responses to each cue seem to be driven by overall preference with both the nutritional value that the pellets predict as well as other factors, such as taste, contributing.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22170625      PMCID: PMC3269555          DOI: 10.1002/syn.21519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Synapse        ISSN: 0887-4476            Impact factor:   2.562


  36 in total

1.  Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals.

Authors:  Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Peptide YY3-36 decreases reinstatement of high-fat food seeking during dieting in a rat relapse model.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; Sunila G Nair; Sam A Golden; Sarah M Gray; Jamie L Uejima; Jennifer M Bossert; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The neuropharmacology of relapse to food seeking: methodology, main findings, and comparison with relapse to drug seeking.

Authors:  Sunila G Nair; Tristan Adams-Deutsch; David H Epstein; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-18       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Joanna S Fowler; Panayotis K Thanos; Jean Logan; David Alexoff; Yu-Shin Ding; Christopher Wong; Yeming Ma; Kith Pradhan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neural encoding of cocaine-seeking behavior is coincident with phasic dopamine release in the accumbens core and shell.

Authors:  Catarina A Owesson-White; Jennifer Ariansen; Garret D Stuber; Nathan A Cleaveland; Joseph F Cheer; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele.

Authors:  E Stice; S Spoor; C Bohon; D M Small
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Real-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli.

Authors:  Mitchell F Roitman; Robert A Wheeler; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Integration of reward signalling and appetite regulating peptide systems in the control of food-cue responses.

Authors:  A C Reichelt; R F Westbrook; M J Morris
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Reassessing wanting and liking in the study of mesolimbic influence on food intake.

Authors:  Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling tracks the need-based motivational value of food-paired cues.

Authors:  Tara J Aitken; Venuz Y Greenfield; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food.

Authors:  Jeff A Beeler; James E McCutcheon; Zhen F H Cao; Mari Murakami; Erin Alexander; Mitchell F Roitman; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Establishing causality for dopamine in neural function and behavior with optogenetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Steinberg; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Dynamics of rapid dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens during goal-directed behaviors for cocaine versus natural rewards.

Authors:  Courtney M Cameron; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Recent studies of the effects of sugars on brain systems involved in energy balance and reward: Relevance to low calorie sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan Murray; Alastair Tulloch; Kristen Criscitelli; Nicole M Avena
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-09

8.  Amylin modulates the mesolimbic dopamine system to control energy balance.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mietlicki-Baase; David J Reiner; Jackson J Cone; Diana R Olivos; Lauren E McGrath; Derek J Zimmer; Mitchell F Roitman; Matthew R Hayes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Sucrose ingestion induces rapid AMPA receptor trafficking.

Authors:  David S Tukey; Jainne M Ferreira; Shannon O Antoine; James A D'amour; Ipe Ninan; Soledad Cabeza de Vaca; Salvatore Incontro; Charlotte Wincott; Julian K Horwitz; Diana T Hartner; Carlo B Guarini; Latika Khatri; Yossef Goffer; Duo Xu; Roseann F Titcombe; Megna Khatri; Dave S Marzan; Shahana S Mahajan; Jing Wang; Robert C Froemke; Kenneth D Carr; Chiye Aoki; Edward B Ziff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Glucose utilization rates regulate intake levels of artificial sweeteners.

Authors:  Luis A Tellez; Xueying Ren; Wenfei Han; Sara Medina; Jozélia G Ferreira; Catherine W Yeckel; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.