[Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) (TBC = 1,4,8,11-tetrabenzyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) is characterized, and its reactivity differences relative to [Fe(IV)═O(TMC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) (TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) are evaluated in hydrogen atom (H-atom) abstraction and oxo-transfer reactions. Structural differences are defined using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and correlated to reactivities using density functional theory. The S = 1 ground states are highly similar and result in large activation barriers (~25 kcal/mol) due to steric interactions between the cyclam chelate and the substrate (e.g., ethylbenzene) associated with the equatorial π-attack required by this spin state. Conversely, H-atom abstraction reactivity on an S = 2 surface allows for a σ-attack with an axial substrate approach. This results in decreased steric interactions with the cyclam and a lower barrier (~9 kcal/mol). For [Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+), the S = 2 excited state in the reactant is lower in energy and therefore more accessible at the transition state due to a weaker ligand field associated with the steric interactions of the benzyl substituents with the trans-axial ligand. This study is further extended to the oxo-transfer reaction, which is a two-electron process requiring both σ- and π-electron transfer and thus a nonlinear transition state. In oxo-transfer, the S = 2 has a lower barrier due to sequential vs concerted (S = 1) two electron transfer which gives a high-spin ferric intermediate at the transition state. The [Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) complex is more distorted at the transition state, with the iron farther out of the equatorial plane due to the steric interaction of the benzyl groups with the trans-axial ligand. This allows for better orbital overlap with the substrate, a lower barrier, and an increased rate of oxo-transfer.
[Fe(IV)═O(n class="Chemical">TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) (TBC = 1,4,8,11-tetrabenzyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) is characterized, and its reactivity differences relative to [Fe(IV)═O(TMC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) (TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) are evaluated in hydrogen atom (H-atom) abstraction and oxo-transfer reactions. Structural differences are defined using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and correlated to reactivities using density functional theory. The S = 1 ground states are highly similar and result in large activation barriers (~25 kcal/mol) due to steric interactions between the cyclam chelate and the substrate (e.g., ethylbenzene) associated with the equatorial π-attack required by this spin state. Conversely, H-atom abstraction reactivity on an S = 2 surface allows for a σ-attack with an axial substrate approach. This results in decreased steric interactions with the cyclam and a lower barrier (~9 kcal/mol). For [Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+), the S = 2 excited state in the reactant is lower in energy and therefore more accessible at the transition state due to a weaker ligand field associated with the steric interactions of the benzyl substituents with the trans-axial ligand. This study is further extended to the oxo-transfer reaction, which is a two-electron process requiring both σ- and π-electron transfer and thus a nonlinear transition state. In oxo-transfer, the S = 2 has a lower barrier due to sequential vs concerted (S = 1) two electron transfer which gives a high-spinferric intermediate at the transition state. The [Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)](2+) complex is more distorted at the transition state, with the iron farther out of the equatorial plane due to the steric interaction of the benzyl groups with the trans-axial ligand. This allows for better orbital overlap with the substrate, a lower barrier, and an increased rate of oxo-transfer.
Authors: Jochen Bautz; Michael R Bukowski; Marion Kerscher; Audria Stubna; Peter Comba; Achim Lienke; Eckard Münck; Lawrence Que Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Danica Galonić Fujimori; Eric W Barr; Megan L Matthews; Gretchen M Koch; J Ryan Yonce; Christopher T Walsh; J Martin Bollinger; Carsten Krebs; Pamela J Riggs-Gelasco Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Aram Joel Panay; Michael Lee; Carsten Krebs; J Martin Bollinger; Paul F Fitzpatrick Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Shaun D Wong; Caleb B Bell; Lei V Liu; Yeonju Kwak; Jason England; E Ercan Alp; Jiyong Zhao; Lawrence Que; Edward I Solomon Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jason England; Yisong Guo; Erik R Farquhar; Victor G Young; Eckard Münck; Lawrence Que Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael L Neidig; Andrea Decker; Oliver W Choroba; Fanglu Huang; Michael Kavana; Graham R Moran; Jonathan B Spencer; Edward I Solomon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-08-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Srnec; Shaun D Wong; Jason England; Lawrence Que; Edward I Solomon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tibor András Rokob; Jakub Chalupský; Daniel Bím; Prokopis C Andrikopoulos; Martin Srnec; Lubomír Rulíšek Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Ang Zhou; Jai Prakash; Gregory T Rohde; Johannes E M N Klein; Scott T Kleespies; Apparao Draksharapu; Ruixi Fan; Yisong Guo; Christopher J Cramer; Lawrence Que Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Dong Wang; Kallol Ray; Michael J Collins; Erik R Farquhar; Jonathan R Frisch; Laura Gómez; Timothy A Jackson; Marion Kerscher; Arkadius Waleska; Peter Comba; Miquel Costas; Lawrence Que Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Sumit Sahu; Bo Zhang; Christopher J Pollock; Maximilian Dürr; Casey G Davies; Alex M Confer; Ivana Ivanović-Burmazović; Maxime A Siegler; Guy N L Jameson; Carsten Krebs; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael L Baker; Michael W Mara; James J Yan; Keith O Hodgson; Britt Hedman; Edward I Solomon Journal: Coord Chem Rev Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 22.315
Authors: Jason England; Jennifer O Bigelow; Katherine M Van Heuvelen; Erik R Farquhar; Marléne Martinho; Katlyn K Meier; Jonathan R Frisch; Eckard Münck; Lawrence Que Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 9.825