[Fe(IV)(O)(TMG(3)tren)](2+) (1; TMG(3)tren = 1,1,1-tris{2-[N(2)-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidino)]ethyl}amine) is a unique example of an isolable synthetic S = 2 oxoiron(IV) complex, which serves as a model for the high-valent oxoiron(IV) intermediates observed in nonheme iron enzymes. Congruent with DFT calculations predicting a more reactive S = 2 oxoiron(IV) center, 1 has a lifetime significantly shorter than those of related S = 1 oxoiron(IV) complexes. The self-decay of 1 exhibits strictly first-order kinetic behavior and is unaffected by solvent deuteration, suggesting an intramolecular process. This hypothesis was supported by ESI-MS analysis of the iron products and a significant retardation of self-decay upon use of a perdeuteromethyl TMG(3)tren isotopomer, d(36)-1 (KIE = 24 at 25 degrees C). The greatly enhanced thermal stability of d(36)-1 allowed growth of diffraction quality crystals for which a high-resolution crystal structure was obtained. This structure showed an Fe horizontal lineO unit (r = 1.661(2) A) in the intended trigonal bipyramidal geometry enforced by the sterically bulky tetramethylguanidinyl donors of the tetradentate tripodal TMG(3)tren ligand. The close proximity of the methyl substituents to the oxoiron unit yielded three symmetrically oriented short C-D...O nonbonded contacts (2.38-2.49 A), an arrangement that facilitated self-decay by rate-determining intramolecular hydrogen atom abstraction and subsequent formation of a ligand-hydroxylated iron(III) product. EPR and Mossbauer quantification of the various iron products, referenced against those obtained from reaction of 1 with 1,4-cyclohexadiene, allowed formulation of a detailed mechanism for the self-decay process. The solution of this first crystal structure of a high-spin (S = 2) oxoiron(IV) center represents a fundamental step on the path toward a full understanding of these pivotal biological intermediates.
[Fe(IV)(O)(n class="Chemical">TMG(3)tren)](2+) (1; TMG(3)tren = 1,1,1-tris{2-[N(2)-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidino)]ethyl}amine) is a unique example of an isolable synthetic S = 2 oxoiron(IV) complex, which serves as a model for the high-valent oxoiron(IV) intermediates observed in nonhemeiron enzymes. Congruent with DFT calculations predicting a more reactive S = 2 oxoiron(IV) center, 1 has a lifetime significantly shorter than those of related S = 1 oxoiron(IV) complexes. The self-decay of 1 exhibits strictly first-order kinetic behavior and is unaffected by solvent deuteration, suggesting an intramolecular process. This hypothesis was supported by ESI-MS analysis of the iron products and a significant retardation of self-decay upon use of a perdeuteromethyl TMG(3)tren isotopomer, d(36)-1 (KIE = 24 at 25 degrees C). The greatly enhanced thermal stability of d(36)-1 allowed growth of diffraction quality crystals for which a high-resolution crystal structure was obtained. This structure showed an Fe horizontal lineO unit (r = 1.661(2) A) in the intended trigonal bipyramidal geometry enforced by the sterically bulky tetramethylguanidinyl donors of the tetradentate tripodal TMG(3)tren ligand. The close proximity of the methyl substituents to the oxoiron unit yielded three symmetrically oriented short C-D...O nonbonded contacts (2.38-2.49 A), an arrangement that facilitated self-decay by rate-determining intramolecular hydrogen atom abstraction and subsequent formation of a ligand-hydroxylated iron(III) product. EPR and Mossbauer quantification of the various iron products, referenced against those obtained from reaction of 1 with 1,4-cyclohexadiene, allowed formulation of a detailed mechanism for the self-decay process. The solution of this first crystal structure of a high-spin (S = 2) oxoiron(IV) center represents a fundamental step on the path toward a full understanding of these pivotal biological intermediates.
Authors: Sarmistha Chakrabarty; Rachel N Austin; Dayi Deng; John T Groves; John D Lipscomb Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Maarten Merkx; Daniel A. Kopp; Matthew H. Sazinsky; Jessica L. Blazyk; Jens Müller; Stephen J. Lippard Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2001-08-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Megan L Matthews; Christopher S Neumann; Linde A Miles; Tyler L Grove; Squire J Booker; Carsten Krebs; Christopher T Walsh; J Martin Bollinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Megan L Matthews; Courtney M Krest; Eric W Barr; Frédéric H Vaillancourt; Christopher T Walsh; Michael T Green; Carsten Krebs; J Martin Bollinger Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Christina D Brown; Michael L Neidig; Matthew B Neibergall; John D Lipscomb; Edward I Solomon Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: P Chandrasekaran; S Chantal E Stieber; Terrence J Collins; Lawrence Que; Frank Neese; Serena DeBeer Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Savita K Sharma; Hyun Kim; Patrick J Rogler; Maxime A Siegler; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Dianne J Xiao; Eric D Bloch; Jarad A Mason; Wendy L Queen; Matthew R Hudson; Nora Planas; Joshua Borycz; Allison L Dzubak; Pragya Verma; Kyuho Lee; Francesca Bonino; Valentina Crocellà; Junko Yano; Silvia Bordiga; Donald G Truhlar; Laura Gagliardi; Craig M Brown; Jeffrey R Long Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Konstantinos D Vogiatzis; Mikhail V Polynski; Justin K Kirkland; Jacob Townsend; Ali Hashemi; Chong Liu; Evgeny A Pidko Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Jason England; Yisong Guo; Katherine M Van Heuvelen; Matthew A Cranswick; Gregory T Rohde; Emile L Bominaar; Eckard Münck; Lawrence Que Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dong Wang; Kallol Ray; Michael J Collins; Erik R Farquhar; Jonathan R Frisch; Laura Gómez; Timothy A Jackson; Marion Kerscher; Arkadius Waleska; Peter Comba; Miquel Costas; Lawrence Que Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 9.825