Literature DB >> 22707232

Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Marleen Peumans1, M Voet, J De Munck, K Van Landuyt, A Van Ende, B Van Meerbeek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of a self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), used for cementation of ceramic inlays. In addition, the influence of selectively acid-etching enamel prior to luting on the clinical performance of the restorations was assessed.
METHODS: Sixty-two IPS Empress 2 inlays/onlays were placed in 31 patients by two experienced clinicians. The restorations were luted with RelyX Unicem with (=experimental group: E) or without (=control group: NE) prior enamel etching with phosphoric acid. At baseline, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 4 years after placement, the restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS criteria. Ten selected samples of each group were investigated under SEM regarding morphological changes at the cement-inlay interface.
RESULTS: The recall rate at 4 years was 97%. Two restorations (1 E, 1 NE) were lost, and one (E) had to be replaced due to inlay and tooth fracture resulting in a survival rate of 95%. No significant differences between the experimental and control group were noticed regarding all criteria (McNemar, p < 0.05). An obvious deterioration in marginal integrity was observed after 4 years as only 5% (E = 7%; NE = 3%) of the restorations exhibited an excellent marginal adaptation. In 90% of the restorations small, still clinically acceptable marginal deficiencies were observed. SEM of the luting gap showed an increased wear of the RelyX Unicem cement over the 4-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: The self-adhesive luting cement RelyX Unicem can be recommended for bonding of ceramic inlays/onlays. Additional selective enamel etching does not improve the clinical performance of the restorations within the 4-year period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The self-adhesive resin composite RelyX Unicem showed acceptable clinical performance after 4 years of clinical service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22707232     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  65 in total

1.  IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.

Authors:  N Krämer; R Frankenberger; M Pelka; A Petschelt
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.

Authors:  M K Molin; S L Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Analysis of longitudinal marginal deterioration of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Mikako Hayashi; Y Tsubakimoto; F Takeshige; S Ebisu
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements.

Authors:  Ovul Kumbuloglu; Lippo V J Lassila; Atilla User; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays.

Authors:  N Krämer; K-H Kunzelmann; M Taschner; A Mehl; F Garcia-Godoy; R Frankenberger
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations.

Authors:  Dennis J Fasbinder
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.

Authors:  Norbert Krämer; Michael Taschner; Ulrich Lohbauer; Anselm Petschelt; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Norbert Krämer; Andreas Appelt; Ulrich Lohbauer; Michael Naumann; Matthias J Roggendorf
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years.

Authors:  Frederike Schenke; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Daniel Moder; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Cytotoxicity of four categories of dental cements.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Alexander Franz; Franz König; Margit Bristela; Trevor Lucas; Eva Piehslinger; David C Watts; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months.

Authors:  Vanessa Vogl; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Marianne Federlin; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays.

Authors:  Dayana Da Silva Gonçalves; María Cura; Laura Ceballos; Mª Victoria Fuentes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.

Authors:  F A Spitznagel; K J Scholz; J R Strub; K Vach; P C Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cuspal-coverage thickness influence on the stress distribution of all-ceramic onlay-restored premolars].

Authors:  Ya-Hu She; Yi-Yi Zhang; Yu-Xuan Liu; Chang-Yun Fang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-01

6.  Longevity of metal-ceramic single crowns cemented onto resin composite prosthetic cores with self-adhesive resin cement: an update of a prospective analysis with up to 106 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Renan Vaz Machry; César Dalmolin Bergoli; Julia Kaster Schwantz; Lucas Pradebon Brondani; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira; Luiz Felipe Valandro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Clinical survival of chair-side generated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns:10-year results.

Authors:  Angelika Rauch; Sven Reich; Luise Dalchau; Oliver Schierz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  João Fernando Bazzo; Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira Pedriali; Ricardo Danil Guiraldo; Sandrine Bittencourt Berger; Sandra Kiss Moura; Rodrigo Varella de de Carvalho
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Cristian Abad-Coronel; Belén Naranjo; Pamela Valdiviezo
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-01

10.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.