Literature DB >> 18849067

Cytotoxicity of four categories of dental cements.

Martina Schmid-Schwap1, Alexander Franz, Franz König, Margit Bristela, Trevor Lucas, Eva Piehslinger, David C Watts, Andreas Schedle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of dental material biocompatibility is gaining increasing importance for both patients and dentists. Dental cements may be in contact with oral soft tissues for prolonged periods of time and play an important role in prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate eight dental cements using a standardized L929-fibroblast cell culture test.
METHODS: For each material, fresh specimens (added to the cultures immediately after preparation) and specimens preincubated for 7 days in cell culture medium were prepared according to the manufacturers' recommendations. After exposure to test specimens, cell numbers were compared to glass controls. The main outcome was a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean value of the standardized cell number for each substance investigated.
RESULTS: Fresh specimens of all tested cements showed significant cytotoxicity, which diminished after 7 days preincubation. Cytotoxicity of fresh adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements was lower when specimens were dual-cured compared to self-cured. A rank order of cytotoxicity was established based on mean values: Nexus 2 (dual-cured) showed least cytotoxicity, followed by Variolink II (dual-cured), Nexus 2 (self-cured), Harvard, RelyxUnicem (dual-cured), Panavia 21, Fujicem, Durelon, Variolink II (self-cured), RelyxUnicem (self-cured), Maxcem (dual-cured) and Maxcem (self-cured). When bondings were added to Nexus 2 or Variolink II specimens, a slight increase in cytotoxicity was observed. SIGNIFICANCE: Adhesive resin cements showed less cytotoxicity than self-adhesive and chemically setting cements. Bonding only slightly influenced cytotoxicity of the adhesive resin cements. Dual-cured specimens of adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements showed significantly less toxicity than self-cured specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849067     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  13 in total

1.  Immortalized gingival fibroblasts as a cytotoxicity test model for dental materials.

Authors:  Rasika P Illeperuma; Young J Park; Jin M Kim; Jung Y Bae; Zhong M Che; Hwa K Son; Mi R Han; Kwang M Kim; Jin Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; M Voet; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; A Van Ende; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Human and bovine pulp-derived cell reactions to dental resin cements.

Authors:  Hayriye Esra Ülker; Karl Anton Hiller; Helmut Schweikl; Claudia Seidenader; Abdulkadir Sengun; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review.

Authors:  Grace De Souza; Roberto Ruggiero Braga; Paulo Francisco Cesar; Guilherme Carpena Lopes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium by Chemicals and Dental Materials.

Authors:  Biju Justus; Syed Sirajuddin; Veenadharini Gundapaneni; Shriparna Biswas; Kumuda Mn; Rakesh Mp
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-06-26

6.  Biocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Luting Cements Using Cytokine Released from Human Oral Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Kwon; Yin-Zhu Piao; Sun-A Cho; Song-Yi Yang; Ji Hoon Kim; Susun An; Kwang-Mahn Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Cytotoxicity Comparison of Harvard Zinc Phosphate Cement Versus Panavia F2 and Rely X Plus Resin Cements on Rat L929-fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sahabi Mahasti; Mandana Sattari; Elham Romoozi; Alireza Akbar-Zadeh Baghban
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Cytotoxicity testing of temporary luting cements with two- and three-dimensional cultures of bovine dental pulp-derived cells.

Authors:  Hayriye Esra Ülker; Mustafa Ülker; Hasan Önder Gümüş; Muhammet Yalçın; Abdulkadir Şengün
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Biological Effects of ACTIVA Kids BioACTIVE Restorative, Ionolux, and Riva Light Cure on Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sergio López-García; María P Pecci-Lloret; Miguel R Pecci-Lloret; Ricardo E Oñate-Sánchez; David García-Bernal; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Julia Guerrero-Gironés
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  The antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of a copper-loaded zinc oxide phosphate cement.

Authors:  Torsten Wassmann; Andrea Schubert; Felix Malinski; Martin Rosentritt; Sebastian Krohn; Kirsten Techmer; Ralf Bürgers
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.