BACKGROUND: Although bacterial biofilm is recognized as an important contributor to chronic wound pathogenesis, differences in biofilm virulence between species have never been studied in vivo. STUDY DESIGN: Dermal punch wounds in New Zealand white rabbit ears were inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or left uninfected as controls. In vivo biofilm was established and maintained using procedures from our previously published wound biofilm model. Virulence was assessed by measurement of histologic wound healing and host inflammatory mediators. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and bacterial counts verified biofilm viability. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-deficient P aeruginosa was used for comparison. RESULTS: SEM confirmed the presence of wound biofilm for each species. P aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds showed significantly more healing impairment than uninfected, K pneumoniae, and S aureus (p < 0.05), while also triggering the largest host inflammatory response (p < 0.05). Extracellular polymeric substance-deficient P aeruginosa demonstrated a reduced impact on the same quantitative endpoints relative to its wild-type strain (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel analysis demonstrates that individual bacterial species possess distinct levels of biofilm virulence. Biofilm EPS may represent an integral part of their distinct pathogenicity. Rigorous examination of species-dependent differences in biofilm virulence is critical to developing specific therapeutics, while lending insight to the interactions within clinically relevant, polybacterial biofilms.
BACKGROUND: Although bacterial biofilm is recognized as an important contributor to chronic wound pathogenesis, differences in biofilm virulence between species have never been studied in vivo. STUDY DESIGN: Dermal punch wounds in New Zealand white rabbit ears were inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or left uninfected as controls. In vivo biofilm was established and maintained using procedures from our previously published wound biofilm model. Virulence was assessed by measurement of histologic wound healing and host inflammatory mediators. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and bacterial counts verified biofilm viability. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-deficient P aeruginosa was used for comparison. RESULTS: SEM confirmed the presence of wound biofilm for each species. P aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds showed significantly more healing impairment than uninfected, K pneumoniae, and S aureus (p < 0.05), while also triggering the largest host inflammatory response (p < 0.05). Extracellular polymeric substance-deficient P aeruginosa demonstrated a reduced impact on the same quantitative endpoints relative to its wild-type strain (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel analysis demonstrates that individual bacterial species possess distinct levels of biofilm virulence. Biofilm EPS may represent an integral part of their distinct pathogenicity. Rigorous examination of species-dependent differences in biofilm virulence is critical to developing specific therapeutics, while lending insight to the interactions within clinically relevant, polybacterial biofilms.
Authors: Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Steven L Percival; Claudia Vuotto; Gianfranco Donelli; Benjamin A Lipsky Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Elena Y Trizna; Maria N Yarullina; Diana R Baidamshina; Anna V Mironova; Farida S Akhatova; Elvira V Rozhina; Rawil F Fakhrullin; Alsu M Khabibrakhmanova; Almira R Kurbangalieva; Mikhail I Bogachev; Airat R Kayumov Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Garth A James; Alice Ge Zhao; Marcia Usui; Robert A Underwood; Hung Nguyen; Haluk Beyenal; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Alessandra Agostinho Hunt; Hans C Bernstein; Philip Fleckman; John Olerud; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Philip S Stewart Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Irena Pastar; Aron G Nusbaum; Joel Gil; Shailee B Patel; Juan Chen; Jose Valdes; Olivera Stojadinovic; Lisa R Plano; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Stephen C Davis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240