Literature DB >> 22704819

Quantitative comparison and analysis of species-specific wound biofilm virulence using an in vivo, rabbit-ear model.

Akhil K Seth1, Matthew R Geringer, Robert D Galiano, Kai P Leung, Thomas A Mustoe, Seok J Hong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bacterial biofilm is recognized as an important contributor to chronic wound pathogenesis, differences in biofilm virulence between species have never been studied in vivo. STUDY
DESIGN: Dermal punch wounds in New Zealand white rabbit ears were inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or left uninfected as controls. In vivo biofilm was established and maintained using procedures from our previously published wound biofilm model. Virulence was assessed by measurement of histologic wound healing and host inflammatory mediators. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and bacterial counts verified biofilm viability. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-deficient P aeruginosa was used for comparison.
RESULTS: SEM confirmed the presence of wound biofilm for each species. P aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds showed significantly more healing impairment than uninfected, K pneumoniae, and S aureus (p < 0.05), while also triggering the largest host inflammatory response (p < 0.05). Extracellular polymeric substance-deficient P aeruginosa demonstrated a reduced impact on the same quantitative endpoints relative to its wild-type strain (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our novel analysis demonstrates that individual bacterial species possess distinct levels of biofilm virulence. Biofilm EPS may represent an integral part of their distinct pathogenicity. Rigorous examination of species-dependent differences in biofilm virulence is critical to developing specific therapeutics, while lending insight to the interactions within clinically relevant, polybacterial biofilms.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704819     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Sara M McCarty; Benjamin Lipsky
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.

Authors:  Kasturi Ganesh; Mithun Sinha; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Amitava Das; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Biofilms and Wounds: An Identification Algorithm and Potential Treatment Options.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Claudia Vuotto; Gianfranco Donelli; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Jakub Kwiecinski; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Tao Jin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Bidirectional alterations in antibiotics susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus-Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilm.

Authors:  Elena Y Trizna; Maria N Yarullina; Diana R Baidamshina; Anna V Mironova; Farida S Akhatova; Elvira V Rozhina; Rawil F Fakhrullin; Alsu M Khabibrakhmanova; Almira R Kurbangalieva; Mikhail I Bogachev; Airat R Kayumov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Dermal fibroblast cells interactions with single and triple bacterial-species biofilms.

Authors:  Betül Çelebi-Saltik; Didem Kart
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in disease.

Authors:  Lawrence R Mulcahy; Vincent M Isabella; Kim Lewis
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Microsensor and transcriptomic signatures of oxygen depletion in biofilms associated with chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Alice Ge Zhao; Marcia Usui; Robert A Underwood; Hung Nguyen; Haluk Beyenal; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Alessandra Agostinho Hunt; Hans C Bernstein; Philip Fleckman; John Olerud; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Interactions of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in polymicrobial wound infection.

Authors:  Irena Pastar; Aron G Nusbaum; Joel Gil; Shailee B Patel; Juan Chen; Jose Valdes; Olivera Stojadinovic; Lisa R Plano; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Stephen C Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.