Literature DB >> 34009564

Dermal fibroblast cells interactions with single and triple bacterial-species biofilms.

Betül Çelebi-Saltik1,2, Didem Kart3.   

Abstract

Polymicrobial biofilm leads to wound healing delay. We set up an in vitro co-culture model of single- and triple-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis with dermal fibroblast to assess the fibroblast response against to the different biofilms. Scratch and viability assays and biofilm cell quantifications were performed by WST-1, CLSM and plating method, respectively. Quorum sensing-related gene expression levels in P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis were analysed by reverse-transcriptase PCR. The immune responses of cells against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis biofilms were measured by cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase analyzes. The influence of biofilm soluble factors on fibroblasts was also determined. After 24 h, triple-species biofilm cells caused the removal of the fibroblasts from the surfaces indicating the negative synergistic effect of three species. After co-cultures, twenty-five cytokines were significantly increased in fibroblast cells compared to control. Compared to other strains, the most important cytokine, chemokine and growth factors increased was observed in P. aeruginosa co-cultures with fibroblast. While the expressions of fsrB and gelE genes were significantly upregulated in E. faecalis biofilm cells cultured with fibroblast cells, no significant difference was observed in P. aeruginosa. The wound healing and cell growth of fibroblasts were disrupted more aggressively in the presence of P. aeruginosa and triple-species biofilm cells. P. aeruginosa generally induced a stronger immune response in the fibroblasts than E. faecalis and S. aureus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokine; E. faecalis; P. aeruginosa; Polymicrobial biofilm; S. aureus; Scratch closure

Year:  2021        PMID: 34009564     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06391-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  45 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro and In Vivo Biofilm Wound Models and Their Application.

Authors:  Gilles Brackman; Tom Coenye
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Murine immune response to a chronic Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection.

Authors:  Ranjani Prabhakara; Janette M Harro; Jeff G Leid; Megan Harris; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management.

Authors:  Georg Daeschlein
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm.

Authors:  R D Wolcott; D D Rhoads; M E Bennett; B M Wolcott; L Gogokhia; J W Costerton; S E Dowd
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 5.  Interactions in multispecies biofilms: do they actually matter?

Authors:  Mette Burmølle; Dawei Ren; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Søren J Sørensen
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 6.  Microenvironment and microbiology of skin wounds: the role of bacterial biofilms and related factors.

Authors:  A Scalise; A Bianchi; C Tartaglione; E Bolletta; M Pierangeli; M Torresetti; M Marazzi; G Di Benedetto
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The Pathogenic Potential of Proteus mirabilis Is Enhanced by Other Uropathogens during Polymicrobial Urinary Tract Infection.

Authors:  Chelsie E Armbruster; Sara N Smith; Alexandra O Johnson; Valerie DeOrnellas; Kathryn A Eaton; Alejandra Yep; Lona Mody; Weisheng Wu; Harry L T Mobley
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Role of interspecies interactions in dual-species biofilms developed in vitro by uropathogens isolated from polymicrobial urinary catheter-associated bacteriuria.

Authors:  E M Galván; C Mateyca; L Ielpi
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  Wound fluid lactate concentration: a helpful marker for diagnosing soft-tissue infection in diabetic foot ulcers? Preliminary findings.

Authors:  M Löffler; D Zieker; J Weinreich; S Löb; I Königsrainer; S Symons; S Bühler; A Königsrainer; H Northoff; S Beckert
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  An in vivo polymicrobial biofilm wound infection model to study interspecies interactions.

Authors:  Trevor Dalton; Scot E Dowd; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Chase Watters; John A Griswold; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.