Literature DB >> 26155379

Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence.

Steven L Percival1, Sara M McCarty2, Benjamin Lipsky3.   

Abstract

Significance: Microorganisms can exist both in the planktonic and biofilm state. Each phenotypic state has a role to play in delaying healing and causing infections of both acute and chronic wounds. However, the virulent biofilm state is the fundamental reason that chronic wounds do not heal in a timely manner. We hypothesize that because microorganisms attach to any surface, biofilms can be found in all chronic wounds. However, it is not the biofilm per se that represents the greatest obstacle to the healing of a chronic wound, but its virulence and pathogenicity. Recent Advances: Numerous studies with animals and humans have identified biofilms in wounds. In particular, these studies have highlighted how biofilms impede host fibroblast development, inflammatory responses, and the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy. Despite this, the role biofilms play in affecting the healing of wounds is still vigorously debated. Critical Issues: Clinicians must understand the role that pathogenic biofilms play in impairing the healing of chronic wounds and in increasing the risk for wound infection, with its potentially catastrophic outcomes. The composition of the biofilm, its physiochemical properties, the climaxed indigenous microbiota and their virulence/pathogenicity, microbial numbers and the host's pathophysiology, and immunological fitness will govern the sustainability of a pathogenic biofilm in a wound and its resistance to interventions. Future Directions: Establishing which specific pathogenic biofilms delay wound healing should help guide better wound care practices.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26155379      PMCID: PMC4486148          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2014.0557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  44 in total

1.  Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window.

Authors:  R D Wolcott; K P Rumbaugh; G James; G Schultz; P Phillips; Q Yang; C Watters; P S Stewart; S E Dowd
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm aggravates skin inflammatory response in BALB/c mice in a novel chronic wound model.

Authors:  Hannah Trøstrup; Kim Thomsen; Lars J Christophersen; Hans P Hougen; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Peter Ø Jensen; Nikolai Kirkby; Henrik Calum; Niels Høiby; Claus Moser
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Staphylococcus aureus infection on cut wounds in the mouse skin: experimental staphylococcal botryomycosis.

Authors:  H Akiyama; H Kanzaki; J Tada; J Arata
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.563

5.  Biofilm evidence and the microbial diversity of horse wounds.

Authors:  Karen Freeman; Emma Woods; Sarah Welsby; Steven L Percival; Christine A Cochrane
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms perturb wound resolution and antibiotic tolerance in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Chase Watters; Katrina DeLeon; Urvish Trivedi; John A Griswold; Mark Lyte; Ken J Hampel; Matthew J Wargo; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Østrup Jensen; Kit G Madsen; Richard Phipps; Karen Krogfelt; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Carlos Ricotti; Alex Cazzaniga; Esperanza Welsh; William H Eaglstein; Patricia M Mertz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Biofilms in chronic diabetic foot ulcers--a study of 2 cases.

Authors:  Daniëlle Neut; Elvira J A Tijdens-Creusen; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Interactions of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in polymicrobial wound infection.

Authors:  Irena Pastar; Aron G Nusbaum; Joel Gil; Shailee B Patel; Juan Chen; Jose Valdes; Olivera Stojadinovic; Lisa R Plano; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Stephen C Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  54 in total

1.  Biofilms and delayed healing - an in vitro evaluation of silver- and iodine-containing dressings and their effect on bacterial and human cells.

Authors:  Katie A Bourdillon; Craig P Delury; Breda M Cullen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Enzyme-encapsulating polymeric nanoparticles: A potential adjunctive therapy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm-associated infection treatment.

Authors:  Chendong Han; James Goodwine; Nicholas Romero; Kyle S Steck; Karin Sauer; Amber Doiron
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 3.  Infection control in colon surgery.

Authors:  Donald E Fry
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Evaluation of Platensimycin and Platensimycin-Inspired Thioether Analogues against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Topical and Systemic Infection Mouse Models.

Authors:  Meng Su; Lin Qiu; Youchao Deng; Claudia H Ruiz; Jeffrey D Rudolf; Liao-Bin Dong; Xueqiong Feng; Michael D Cameron; Ben Shen; Yanwen Duan; Yong Huang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Nanoparticle-Based Therapies for Wound Biofilm Infection: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Min-Ho Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  A 2000 patient retrospective assessment of a new strategy for burn wound management in view of infection prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Justyna Glik; Wojciech Łabuś; Diana Kitala; Karolina Mikuś-Zagórska; Christopher D Roberts; Mariusz Nowak; Aleksandra Kasperczyk; Marek Kawecki
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  In vitro microbicidal, anti-biofilm and cytotoxic effects of different commercial antiseptics.

Authors:  Silvestre Ortega-Peña; Christian Hidalgo-González; Martin C Robson; Edgar Krötzsch
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Comparative Antimicrobial Activity of Commercial Wound Care Solutions on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilms.

Authors:  Melphine M Harriott; Nayan Bhindi; Salam Kassis; Blair Summitt; Galen Perdikis; Blair A Wormer; Timothy M Rankin; Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Mario Samaha; Charles Stratton; Jonathan E Schmitz
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 9.  Evidence-Based Review of Antibiofilm Agents for Wound Care.

Authors:  Maximillian A Weigelt; Stephanie A McNamara; Daniela Sanchez; Penelope A Hirt; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  In vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on P. aeruginosa Wound Biofilm.

Authors:  Ewa Klara Stuermer; Isabell Plattfaut; Michael Dietrich; Florian Brill; Andreas Kampe; Vanessa Wiencke; Anna Ulatowski; Maria Geffken; Julian-Dario Rembe; Ella Alexandrovna Naumova; Sebastian Eike Debus; Ralf Smeets
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.