Literature DB >> 26155380

Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.

Kasturi Ganesh1, Mithun Sinha1, Shomita S Mathew-Steiner1, Amitava Das1, Sashwati Roy1, Chandan K Sen1.   

Abstract

Significance: Multispecies microbial biofilms may contribute to wound chronicity by derailing the inherent reparative process of the host tissue. In the biofilm form, bacteria are encased within an extracellular polymeric substance and become recalcitrant to antimicrobials and host defenses. For biofilms of relevance to human health, there are two primary contributing factors: the microbial species involved and host response which, in turn, shapes microbial processes over time. This progressive interaction between microbial species and the host is an iterative process that helps evolve an acute-phase infection to a pathogenic chronic biofilm. Thus, long-term wound infection studies are needed to understand the longitudinal cascade of events that culminate into a pathogenic wound biofilm. Recent Advances: Our laboratory has recently published the first long-term (2 month) study of polymicrobial wound biofilm infection in a translationally valuable porcine wound model. Critical Issues: It is widely recognized that the porcine system represents the most translationally valuable approach to experimentally model human skin wounds. A meaningful experimental biofilm model must be in vivo, include mixed species of clinically relevant microbes, and be studied longitudinally long term. Cross-validation of such experimental findings with findings from biofilm-infected patient wounds is critically important. Future Directions: Additional value may be added to the experimental system described above by studying pigs with underlying health complications (e.g., metabolic syndrome), as is typically seen in patient populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26155380      PMCID: PMC4486719          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2014.0587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  53 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; Pradeep K Singh
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Staphylococcus aureus infection on cut wounds in the mouse skin: experimental staphylococcal botryomycosis.

Authors:  H Akiyama; H Kanzaki; J Tada; J Arata
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.563

5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms perturb wound resolution and antibiotic tolerance in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Chase Watters; Katrina DeLeon; Urvish Trivedi; John A Griswold; Mark Lyte; Ken J Hampel; Matthew J Wargo; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Carlos Ricotti; Alex Cazzaniga; Esperanza Welsh; William H Eaglstein; Patricia M Mertz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Localized gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Ailyn P Lenz; Kerry S Williamson; Betsey Pitts; Philip S Stewart; Michael J Franklin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  RNAIII-inhibiting peptide enhances healing of wounds infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Oriana Simonetti; Oscar Cirioni; Roberto Ghiselli; Gaia Goteri; Alessandro Scalise; Fiorenza Orlando; Carmela Silvestri; Alessandra Riva; Vittorio Saba; Kiran D Madanahally; Annamaria Offidani; Naomi Balaban; Giorgio Scalise; Andrea Giacometti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Biofilms and persistent wound infections in United States military trauma patients: a case-control analysis.

Authors:  Kevin S Akers; Katrin Mende; Kristelle A Cheatle; Wendy C Zera; Xin Yu; Miriam L Beckius; Deepak Aggarwal; Ping Li; Carlos J Sanchez; Joseph C Wenke; Amy C Weintrob; David R Tribble; Clinton K Murray
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Interactions of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in polymicrobial wound infection.

Authors:  Irena Pastar; Aron G Nusbaum; Joel Gil; Shailee B Patel; Juan Chen; Jose Valdes; Olivera Stojadinovic; Lisa R Plano; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Stephen C Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Phenazine Antibiotic-Inspired Discovery of Bacterial Biofilm-Eradicating Agents.

Authors:  Robert W Huigens; Yasmeen Abouelhassan; Hongfen Yang
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.164

2.  Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing.

Authors:  Kasturi Ganesh Barki; Amitava Das; Sriteja Dixith; Piya Das Ghatak; Shomita Mathew-Steiner; Elizabeth Schwab; Savita Khanna; Daniel J Wozniak; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Histopathological comparisons of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa experimental infected porcine burn wounds.

Authors:  Sarah B Chaney; Kasturi Ganesh; Shomita Mathew-Steiner; Paul Stromberg; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen; Daniel J Wozniak
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Treatment with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Glycoside Hydrolase PslG Combats Wound Infection by Improving Antibiotic Efficacy and Host Innate Immune Activity.

Authors:  Matthew J Pestrak; Perrin Baker; Sheri Dellos-Nolan; Preston J Hill; Daniel Passos da Silva; Holly Silver; Ira Lacdao; Deepa Raju; Matthew R Parsek; Daniel J Wozniak; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Viable bacteria persist on antibiotic spacers following two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Dongzhu Ma; Robert M Q Shanks; Charles M Davis; David W Craft; Thomas K Wood; Brian R Hamlin; Kenneth L Urish
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Biofilm Management in Wound Care.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Gayle M Gordillo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  Electroceutical Management of Bacterial Biofilms and Surgical Infection.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Amitava Das; Vishnu Baba Sundaresan; Sashwati Roy
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Multidimensional Pain Characteristics in Older Adults with Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers.

Authors:  Junglyun Kim; Diana J Wilkie; Michael Weaver; Debra Lyon; Debra L Kelly; Susan B Millan; Jungmin Park; Joyce Stechmiller
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 9.  Wound Repair and Extremely Low Frequency-Electromagnetic Field: Insight from In Vitro Study and Potential Clinical Application.

Authors:  Giulio Gualdi; Erica Costantini; Marcella Reale; Paolo Amerio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Development of an Experimental Ex Vivo Wound Model to Evaluate Antimicrobial Efficacy of Topical Formulations.

Authors:  Madelene Å Andersson; Lone Bruhn Madsen; Artur Schmidtchen; Manoj Puthia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.