Literature DB >> 25586078

Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections.

Jakub Kwiecinski1, Gunnar Kahlmeter, Tao Jin.   

Abstract

Many diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus are associated with biofilm formation. However, the ability of S. aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to form biofilms has not yet been investigated. We tested 160 isolates from patients with various skin infections for biofilm-forming capacity in different growth media. All the isolates formed biofilms, the extent of which depended on the type of growth medium. The thickest biofilms were formed when both plasma and glucose were present in the broth; in this case, S. aureus incorporated host fibrin into the biofilm's matrix. There were no differences in the biofilm formation between isolates from different types of skin infections, except for a particularly good biofilm formation by isolates from diabetic wounds and a weaker biofilm formation by isolates from impetigo. In conclusion, biofilm formation is a universal behavior of S. aureus isolates from skin infections. In some cases, such as in diabetic wounds, a particularly strong biofilm formation most likely contributes to the chronic and recurrent character of the infection. Additionally, as S. aureus apparently uses host fibrin as part of the biofilm structure, we suggest that plasma should be included more frequently in in vitro biofilm studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25586078     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-014-0770-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  35 in total

Review 1.  Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Timothy J Foster; Joan A Geoghegan; Vannakambadi K Ganesh; Magnus Höök
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo systems to study ica-independent Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Fabienne Antunes Ferreira; Raquel Rodrigues Souza; Raquel Regina Bonelli; Marco Antônio Américo; Sérgio Eduardo Longo Fracalanzza; Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 3.  New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections.

Authors:  Megan R Kiedrowski; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Biofilm density and detection of biofilm-producing genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Ewa Szczuka; Katarzyna Urbańska; Marta Pietryka; Adam Kaznowski
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  An improved medium for growing Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Johnathan J Abercrombie; Nicole R Jeffrey; Kai P Leung
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Neill; Clarissa Pozzi; Patrick Houston; Davida Smyth; Hilary Humphreys; D Ashley Robinson; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Molecular and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surgical site infections.

Authors:  Giovanna Pulcrano; Antonio Vollaro; Fabio Rossano; Maria Rosaria Catania
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.150

8.  The role of staphylothrombin-mediated fibrin deposition in catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Thomas Vanassche; Marijke Peetermans; Lucas N L Van Aelst; Willy E Peetermans; Jan Verhaegen; Dominique M Missiakas; Olaf Schneewind; Marc F Hoylaerts; Peter Verhamme
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Carlos Ricotti; Alex Cazzaniga; Esperanza Welsh; William H Eaglstein; Patricia M Mertz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Diabetic mouse model of orthopaedic implant-related Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Arianna B Lovati; Lorenzo Drago; Lorenzo Monti; Elena De Vecchi; Sara Previdi; Giuseppe Banfi; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Microscopy visualisation confirms multi-species biofilms are ubiquitous in diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Khalid Johani; Matthew Malone; Slade Jensen; Iain Gosbell; Hugh Dickson; Honhua Hu; Karen Vickery
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Tissue Plasminogen Activator Coating on Implant Surfaces Reduces Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  Jakub Kwiecinski; Manli Na; Anders Jarneborn; Gunnar Jacobsson; Marijke Peetermans; Peter Verhamme; Tao Jin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacteriophage Lysin CF-301, a Potent Antistaphylococcal Biofilm Agent.

Authors:  Raymond Schuch; Babar K Khan; Assaf Raz; Jimmy A Rotolo; Michael Wittekind
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates correlates with the infection type.

Authors:  Jakub M Kwiecinski; Gunnar Jacobsson; Alexander R Horswill; Elisabet Josefsson; Tao Jin
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-15

Review 5.  [The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].

Authors:  C Scheuermann-Poley; C Wagner; J Hoffmann; A Moter; C Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Dosage-dependent antimicrobial activity of DNA-histone microwebs against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ting Yang; Shi Yang; Tasdiq Ahmed; Katherine Nguyen; Jinlong Yu; Xuejun Cao; Rui Zan; Xiaonong Zhang; Hao Shen; Meredith E Fay; Evelyn Kendall Williams; Wilbur A Lam; J Scott VanEpps; Shuichi Takayama; Yang Song
Journal:  Adv Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  In Vivo Gentamicin Susceptibility Test for Prevention of Bacterial Biofilms in Bone Tissue and on Implants.

Authors:  Louise Kruse Jensen; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Nicole Lind Henriksen; Sophie Amalie Blirup; Karen Pankoke; Andreas Petersen; Henrik Elvang Jensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Katrin Schilcher; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Antifungal Azoles as Tetracycline Resistance Modifiers in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Nisha Mahey; Rushikesh Tambat; Dipesh Kumar Verma; Nishtha Chandal; Krishan Gopal Thakur; Hemraj Nandanwar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  High Glucose Concentration Promotes Vancomycin-Enhanced Biofilm Formation of Vancomycin-Non-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Diabetic Mice.

Authors:  Chi-Yu Hsu; Jwu-Ching Shu; Mei-Hui Lin; Kowit-Yu Chong; Chien-Cheng Chen; Shu-Min Wen; Yi-Ting Hsieh; Wan-Ting Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.