Literature DB >> 11226354

The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.

D F Sly1, G R Heald, S Ray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To outline the design and present selected findings from the evaluation of a state counter-advertising, anti-tobacco media campaign. The appropriateness of the design for states developing media evaluations is discussed.
DESIGN: Four cross sectional, telephone surveys of the 12--17 year old population were used to track and monitor advertising and campaign awareness, confirmed awareness, and receptivity. The Florida baseline and one year surveys were used with two parallel national surveys in a quasi-experimental design to assess attitude and smoking related behaviour change attributable to the campaign. MEASURES: Awareness was measured by self report, confirmed awareness by unaided description, and receptivity by self reports of how well advertisements were liked, talked to friends about, and made one think about whether or not to smoke. Eleven attitude and three smoking behaviour items for Florida (treatment) and a national (control) population were compared at baseline and after 12 months.
RESULTS: Significant increases in ad specific awareness, confirmed, receptivity, and campaign awareness, and confirmed awareness were reached by the sixth week. They continued to rise through the first year. No attitude and only minor behaviour differences were noted between the treatment and comparison populations at baseline. By the end of the first year, Florida youth had stronger anti-tobacco attitudes and better behaviour patterns than the comparison population.
CONCLUSIONS: The industry manipulation strategy used in the Florida campaign resulted in high rates of recall, significant changes in attitudes/beliefs, and reduced rates of smoking behaviour among youth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11226354      PMCID: PMC1763974          DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.1.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  3 in total

1.  The industry manipulation attitudes of smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  D F Sly; G Heald; R S Hopkins; T W Moore; M McCloskey; S Ray
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-05

2.  Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns: the California experience.

Authors:  E D Balbach; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns.

Authors:  L K Goldman; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  3 in total
  50 in total

1.  The strategy behind Florida's "truth" campaign.

Authors:  J J Hicks
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation.

Authors:  R Buchbinder; D Jolley; M Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

3.  Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Cheryl G Healton; Kevin C Davis; Peter Messeri; James C Hersey; M Lyndon Haviland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products.

Authors:  M J Ashley; J E Cohen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Thinking the "unthinkable": why Philip Morris considered quitting.

Authors:  E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions.

Authors:  M C Farrelly; J Niederdeppe; J Yarsevich
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Matthew C Farrelly; M Lyndon Haviland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth campaign.

Authors:  J F Thrasher; J Niederdeppe; M C Farrelly; K C Davis; K M Ribisl; M L Haviland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Trends in recall and appraisal of anti-smoking advertising among American youth: national survey results, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Lloyd D Johnston; Yvonne M Terry-McEllrath; Patrick M O'Malley; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-03

10.  The association among adolescents' tobacco use, their beliefs and attitudes, and friends' and parents' opinions of smoking.

Authors:  Brian C Castrucci; Karen K Gerlach; Nancy J Kaufman; C Tracy Orleans
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.