Literature DB >> 2269886

Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.

C E Connor1, S S Hsiao, J R Phillips, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

Hypothetical neural codes underlying the sensation of tactile roughness were investigated in a combined psychophysical and neurophysiological study. The stimulus set consisted of plastic surfaces embossed with dot arrays of varying dot diameter and center-to-center spacing. Human subjects explored each surface with the pad of the index finger and reported their subjective sense of roughness magnitude. The same surfaces were scanned across the receptive fields of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents in monkeys while recording the evoked action potentials. Hypothetical neural codes for roughness magnitude were computed from the neural response patterns and tested for their ability to account for the psychophysical data. The psychophysical results showed that subjective roughness magnitude is an inverted U-shaped function of dot spacing that peaks near 3.0 mm spacing, and that increased dot diameter produces decreased roughness sensations at all dot spacings. Hypothetical neural codes that do not bear a consistent relationship to roughness magnitude across all of these stimulus conditions can be rejected as the code for roughness. Four types of neural codes were considered. They were based on (1) mean firing rate, (2) general variation in firing rate, (3) short-term temporal variation in firing rate, and (4) local spatial variation in firing rate. Mean firing rate failed to explain the psychophysical results: surfaces that evoked the same firing rate often evoked very different roughness judgments. In contrast, neural codes based on firing-rate variation, especially in slowly adapting afferents, account for the psychophysical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269886      PMCID: PMC6570037     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  68 in total

1.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics.

Authors:  Kenneth O Johnson; Steven S Hsiao; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The vibrations of texture.

Authors:  Sliman J BensmaIa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Surface texture can bias tactile form perception.

Authors:  Masashi Nakatani; Robert D Howe; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The tactile speed aftereffect depends on the speed of adapting motion across the skin rather than other spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.