Literature DB >> 22696542

Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects.

Lee A Baugh1, Michelle Kao, Roland S Johansson, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with well-learned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696542     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00263.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Probabilistic information on object weight shapes force dynamics in a grip-lift task.

Authors:  Leif Trampenau; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Thilo van Eimeren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Parallel specification of competing sensorimotor control policies for alternative action options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Lindsey Logan; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Distinct contributions of explicit and implicit memory processes to weight prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights: an aging study.

Authors:  Kevin M Trewartha; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Somatosensory feedback refines the perception of hand shape with respect to external constraints.

Authors:  S A Winges
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Cognitive attribution of the source of an error in object-lifting results in differences in motor generalization.

Authors:  Kelene Fercho; Lee A Baugh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Henry C H Pun; Gavin Buckingham; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptation of lift forces in object manipulation through action observation.

Authors:  Andreas F Reichelt; Alyssa M Ash; Lee A Baugh; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.