Literature DB >> 25761969

Probabilistic information on object weight shapes force dynamics in a grip-lift task.

Leif Trampenau1, Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck, Thilo van Eimeren.   

Abstract

Advance information, such as object weight, size and texture, modifies predictive scaling of grip forces in a grip-lift task. Here, we examined the influence of probabilistic advance information about object weight. Fifteen healthy volunteers repeatedly grasped and lifted an object equipped with a force transducer between their thumb and index finger. Three clearly distinguishable object weights were used. Prior to each lift, the probabilities for the three object weights were given by a visual cue. We examined the effect of probabilistic pre-cues on grip and lift force dynamics. We expected predictive scaling of grip force parameters to follow predicted values calculated according to probabilistic contingencies of the cues. We observed that probabilistic cues systematically influenced peak grip and load force rates, as an index of predictive motor scaling. However, the effects of probabilistic cues on force rates were nonlinear, and anticipatory adaptations of the motor output generally seemed to overestimate high probabilities and underestimate low probabilities. These findings support the suggestion that anticipatory adaptations and force scaling of the motor system can integrate probabilistic information. However, probabilistic information seems to influence motor programs in a nonlinear fashion.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761969     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4244-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.

Authors:  D A Westwood; A Dubrowski; H Carnahan; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; A H Murray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brain activity is similar during precision and power gripping with light force: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; R Gilster; S Wolff; S Ulmer; H Siebner; O Jansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting.

Authors:  Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Hans Bauer; Christian Marquardt; Georg Goldenberg; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Predictive force programming in the grip-lift task: the role of memory links between arbitrary cues and object weight.

Authors:  Mitra Ameli; Manuel Dafotakis; Gereon R Fink; Dennis A Nowak
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects.

Authors:  Lee A Baugh; Michelle Kao; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adjusting reach to lift movements to sudden visible changes in target's weight.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Ioanna Georgiou; Scott Glover; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Ubiquitous log odds: a common representation of probability and frequency distortion in perception, action, and cognition.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Henry C H Pun; Gavin Buckingham; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Dissociating error-based and reinforcement-based loss functions during sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Ayman Mohatarem; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.