Literature DB >> 22696225

Patient autonomy and informed consent--individual preferences of senior study participants in Germany.

Wolfgang Strube1, Florian Steger.   

Abstract

The majority of therapeutic decision-making takes place between therapists and elderly people. The present study sought to determine the individual preferences of elderly people in the therapist-patient interaction. From October 2010 to January 2011, data from elderly students (n = 297, mean age  > 60) were collected at three different university sites in Germany (Halle-Wittenberg, Cologne and Munich). The study used a structured questionnaire. Younger students (n = 182, mean age = 20.5) at the University of Halle-Wittenberg were questioned as well, in order to show age-specific differences. None of the participants was hospitalised. At the University of Munich, elderly students (n = 42) were given interaction-skill training for patients prior to taking part in the study. The effect of the intervention was measured in the study. Elderly participants and especially those with higher morbidity and a poorer state of information about their state of health refused to get involved in the process of medical decision-making. A group of elderly participants who received special interaction-skill training for patients afterwards preferred an equal therapist-patient relationship as well as shared decision-making. Younger participants favored an informative-participative interaction. The guidelines of therapeutic decision-making that are applied in practise do not always meet the individual needs of the elderly. Interaction-skill training for patients has great potential to both: encourage patients to get involved in the process of medical decision-making and to assume more autonomy. Hence, the aim should be to compound autonomy-empowerment and interaction-skill training for elderly people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696225     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-012-0187-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  13 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

Review 2.  Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.

Authors:  B K Redman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Is consent in medicine a concept only of modern times?

Authors:  P Dalla-Vorgia; J Lascaratos; P Skiadas; T Garanis-Papadatos
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care.

Authors:  P Rosén; A Anell; C Hjortsberg
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study.

Authors:  N B A T Janssen; F J Oort; P Fockens; D L Willems; H C J M de Haes; E M A Smets
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients' and physicians' views.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; A C Molewijk; W Otten; D R M Timmermans; J H van Bockel; J Kievit
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Whose health is it? Views about decision-making and information-seeking from people with HIV infection and their professional carers.

Authors:  J Catalan; N Brener; H Andrews; A Day; S Cullum; M Hooker; B Gazzard
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  1994

Review 9.  Measuring (shared) decision-making--a review of psychometric instruments.

Authors:  Daniela Simon; Andreas Loh; Martin Härter
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007

10.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Audiey Kao; Alma Kuby; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient advance directives in practice.

Authors:  Florian Steger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.594

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.