Literature DB >> 15987329

Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Wendy Levinson1, Audiey Kao, Alma Kuby, Ronald A Thisted.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine calls for physicians to engage patients in making clinical decisions, but not every patient may want the same level of participation.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess public preferences for participation in decision making in a representative sample of the U.S. population. 2) To understand how demographic variables and health status influence people's preferences for participation in decision making. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based survey of a fully representative sample of English-speaking adults was conducted in concert with the 2002 General Social Survey (N= 2,765). Respondents expressed preferences ranging from patient-directed to physician-directed styles on each of 3 aspects of decision making (seeking information, discussing options, making the final decision). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships of demographic variables and health status to preferences. MAIN
RESULTS: Nearly all respondents (96%) preferred to be offered choices and to be asked their opinions. In contrast, half of the respondents (52%) preferred to leave final decisions to their physicians and 44% preferred to rely on physicians for medical knowledge rather than seeking out information themselves. Women, more educated, and healthier people were more likely to prefer an active role in decision making. African-American and Hispanic respondents were more likely to prefer that physicians make the decisions. Preferences for an active role increased with age up to 45 years, but then declined.
CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates that people vary substantially in their preferences for participation in decision making. Physicians and health care organizations should not assume that patients wish to participate in clinical decision making, but must assess individual patient preferences and tailor care accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15987329      PMCID: PMC1490136          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  51 in total

1.  Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  K Fiscella; P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: patient consumerism in medical encounters.

Authors:  A E Beisecker
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1988-06

4.  Blacks in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS): race and clinical decision making.

Authors:  C Maynard; L D Fisher; E R Passamani; T Pullum
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care?

Authors:  S Waterworth; K A Luker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes.

Authors:  S Greenfield; S H Kaplan; J E Ware; E M Yano; H J Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes.

Authors:  S Greenfield; S Kaplan; J E Ware
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?

Authors:  W M Strull; B Lo; G Charles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients.

Authors:  C G Blanchard; M S Labrecque; J C Ruckdeschel; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  353 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Else Tambuyzer; Guido Pieters; Chantal Van Audenhove
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Medical decision-making among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites with chronic back and knee pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Nancy Lyons; Lisa S Wolff; Jodie Silverman; Parastu Emrani; Holly L Holt; Kelly L Corbett; Agustin Escalante; Elena Losina
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Patterns of background factors related to early RA patients' conceptions of the cause of their disease.

Authors:  Ulrika Bergsten; Stefan Bergman; Bengt Fridlund; Lars Alfredsson; Anita Berglund; Barbro Arvidsson; Ingemar F Petersson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Exploring adoption with clients: the need for adoption education within the genetic counseling profession.

Authors:  Cassandra L Perry; Martha J Henry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sara K Johnson; Christopher A Bautista; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa Weissfeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Medical home implementation: a sensemaking taxonomy of hard and soft best practices.

Authors:  Timothy Hoff
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Rong Li; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.