Literature DB >> 15173361

Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients' and physicians' views.

A M Stiggelbout1, A C Molewijk, W Otten, D R M Timmermans, J H van Bockel, J Kievit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence based patient choice seems based on a strong liberal individualist interpretation of patient autonomy; however, not all patients are in favour of such an interpretation. The authors wished to assess whether ideals of autonomy in clinical practice are more in accordance with alternative concepts of autonomy from the ethics literature. This paper describes the development of a questionnaire to assess such concepts of autonomy.
METHODS: A questionnaire, based on six moral concepts from the ethics literature, was sent to aneurysm patients and their surgeons. The structure of the questionnaire was assessed by factor analysis, and item reduction was based on reliability.
RESULTS: Ninety six patients and 58 surgeons participated. The questionnaire consisted of four scales. Two of the scales reflected the paternalistic and consumerist poles of the liberal individualist model, one scale reflected concepts of Socratic autonomy and of procedural independence, and the fourth scale reflected ideals of risk disclosure. DISCUSSION: The Ideal Patient Autonomy Scale is a 14 item normative instrument. It is clearly distinct from the generally used psychological preference questionnaires that assess preferences for physician-patient roles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173361      PMCID: PMC1733851          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.003095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research.

Authors:  A C Molewijk; A M Stiggelbout; W Otten; H M Dupuis; J Kievit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

3.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Medicine's core values.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-12

Review 6.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

7.  Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

Authors:  R F Nease; W B Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; T A Sheldon; A Sowden; I S Watt
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 9.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.

Authors:  G Helgesson; J Ludvigsson; U Gustafsson Stolt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.

Authors:  B K Redman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  To treat or not to treat: who should decide?

Authors:  Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Inge Henselmans; J Hanneke C de Haes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Moral controversy, directive counsel, and the doctor's role: findings from a national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  John D Yoon; Kenneth A Rasinski; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Arild Aakvik
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Person centred care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public health and research.

Authors:  Christian Munthe; Lars Sandman; Daniela Cutas
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-09

7.  Patient autonomy and informed consent--individual preferences of senior study participants in Germany.

Authors:  Wolfgang Strube; Florian Steger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Loss of independence in Katz's ADL ability in connection with an acute hospitalization: early clinical markers in French older people.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Lang; Nicolas Meyer; Damien Heitz; Moustapha Dramé; Nicolas Jovenin; Joël Ankri; Dominique Somme; Jean-Luc Novella; Jean-Bernard Gauvain; Pascal Couturier; Isabelle Lanièce; Thierry Voisin; Benoit de Wazières; Régis Gonthier; Claude Jeandel; Damien Jolly; Olivier Saint-Jean; François Blanchard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Applicability of the principle of respect for autonomy: the perspective of Turkey.

Authors:  Mahmut Alpertunga Kara
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 10.  Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review.

Authors:  France Légaré; David Moher; Glyn Elwyn; Annie LeBlanc; Karine Gravel
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.