Literature DB >> 19407030

Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study.

N B A T Janssen1, F J Oort, P Fockens, D L Willems, H C J M de Haes, E M A Smets.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discussing treatment risks has become increasingly important in medical communication. Still, despite regulations, physicians must decide how much and what kind of information to present.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients' preference for information about a small risk of a complication of colonoscopy, and whether medical and personal factors contribute to such preference. To propose a disclosure policy related to our results.
DESIGN: Vignettes study.
SETTING: Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 810 consecutive colonoscopy patients. INTERVENTION: A home-sent questionnaire containing three vignettes. Vignettes varied in the indication for colonoscopy, complication severity and level of risk. Patients were invited to indicate their wish to be informed and the importance of such information. In addition, sociodemograhic, illness-related and psychological characteristics were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Wish to be informed and importance of information.
RESULTS: Of 810 questionnaires, 68% were returned. Patients generally wished to be informed about low-risk complications, regardless of the indication for colonoscopy or the severity of the complication. The level of risk did matter, though (OR = 2.48, SE = 0.28, p = 0.001). The information was considered less important if done for population screening purposes or diagnosis of colon cancer, if the complication was less severe (bleeding) and if the risk was smaller (0.01% and 0.1%). Patients' information preference was also related to age, mood and coping style. LIMITATIONS: Difficulty of vignettes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally wish to be informed about all possible risks. However, this might become uninformative. A stepwise approach is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19407030     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.025031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

Review 1.  Adverse Event and Complication Management in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  James M Richter; Peter B Kelsey; Emily J Campbell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know.

Authors:  Leila Ukkola; Heljä Oikarinen; Anja Henner; Hilkka Honkanen; Marianne Haapea; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

4.  Patient autonomy and informed consent--individual preferences of senior study participants in Germany.

Authors:  Wolfgang Strube; Florian Steger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Informed consent for innovative surgery: a survey of patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Nancy K Hills; Bernard Lo; Kimberly S Kirkwood
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Predictors for patient knowledge and reported behaviour regarding driving under the influence of medicines: a multi-country survey.

Authors:  Susana P Monteiro; Liset van Dijk; Alain G Verstraete; F Javier Alvarez; Michael Heissing; Johan J de Gier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  An online survey to study the relationship between patients' health literacy and coping style and their preferences for self-management-related information.

Authors:  Sandra Vosbergen; Niels Peek; Johanna Mr Mulder-Wiggers; Hareld Mc Kemps; Roderik A Kraaijenhagen; Monique Wm Jaspers; Joyca Pw Lacroix
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study.

Authors:  Wan-Jung Cheng; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Chung-Han Ho; Chia-Hung Yu; Yi-Chen Chen; Ming-Ping Wu; Chin-Chen Chu; Ying-Jen Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Mercedes Guilabert; Virtudes Pérez-Jover; Susana Lorenzo
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Efficacy of a separate informed consent for anesthesia services: A prospective study from the Caribbean.

Authors:  Kavi Rampersad; Deryk Chen; Seetharaman Hariharan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.