Literature DB >> 22688447

Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.

Qiang Fu1, Judd W Moul, Lionel L Bañez, Leon Sun, Vladimir Mouraviev, Dongha Xie, Thomas J Polascik.   

Abstract

To find the predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a cohort of low-risk prostate cancer patients, data were analyzed comprising 1,632 consecutive men with low-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2009. Assessment focused on preoperative parameters including patient age, race, diagnostic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score, along with pathological parameters including percentage of tumor involvement (PTI), tumor laterality, pathological stage, extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margins. These parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Kaplan-Meier curves compared differences in biochemical disease-free survival in men having cancers with and without Gleason score upgrading. Cases involving pathological Gleason score upgrading were identified in 723 (44.3 %) of 1,632 patients. Kaplan-Meier PSA recurrence-free survival curves showed a difference in outcome between men with and without Gleason score upgrading (p < 0.001). Of Gleason score upgraded patients, 35 (4.8 %) men had PTI of <5 %, 237 (32.8 %) had PTI of 5-9.9 %, 177 (24.5 %) had PTI of 10-14.9 %, and 274 (37.9 %) had PTI ≥ 15 % (p < 0.001). PTI (p < 0.001) along with diagnostic PSA, patient age, diagnostic biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of pathological Gleason score upgrading on multivariate logistic regression. PTI correlates closely with Gleason score upgrading in a low-risk prostate cancer cohort. Low-risk prostate cancer patients with clinical findings suggestive of high PTI or large volume cancers should not benefit from active surveillance strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22688447     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0270-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  20 in total

1.  Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Robert J Hamilton; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  T Fukagai; T Namiki; H Namiki; R G Carlile; M Shimada; H Yoshida
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prostate cancer laterality does not predict prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Leon Sun; John F Madden; Janice M Mayes; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Erik Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg; Jan Adolfsson; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ayman S Moussa; Jianbo Li; Meghan Soriano; Eric A Klein; Fei Dong; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Shao; Kitaw Demissie; Weichung Shih; Amit R Mehta; Mark N Stein; Calpurnyia B Roberts; Robert S Dipaola; Grace L Lu-Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: what are the results, and how safe is it?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Luc Valiquette; Paul Perrotte; Claudio Jeldres; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Cestari; Giorgio Guazzoni; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  8 in total

1.  Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a large African-American population.

Authors:  Anup Vora; Tim Large; Jenny Aronica; Sherod Haynes; Andrew Harbin; Daniel Marchalik; Hanaa Nissim; John Lynch; Gaurav Bandi; Kevin McGeagh; Keith Kowalczyk; Reza Ghasemian; Krishnan Venkatesan; Mohan Verghese; Jonathan Hwang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian Arsov; Nikolaus Becker; Robert Rabenalt; Andreas Hiester; Michael Quentin; Frederic Dietzel; Gerald Antoch; Helmut E Gabbert; Peter Albers; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The effect of differing Gleason scores at biopsy on the odds of upgrading and the risk of death from prostate cancer.

Authors:  John G Phillips; Ayal A Aizer; Ming-Hui Chen; Danjie Zhang; Michelle S Hirsch; Jerome P Richie; Clare M Tempany; Stephen Williams; John V Hegde; Marian J Loffredo; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  The Study of Active Monitoring in Sweden (SAMS): a randomized study comparing two different follow-up schedules for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Stefan Carlsson; Erik Holmberg; Lars Holmberg; Eva Johansson; Andreas Josefsson; Annika Nilsson; Maria Nyberg; David Robinsson; Jonas Sandberg; Dag Sandblom; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.612

5.  Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry - Victoria.

Authors:  Sue M Evans; Varuni Patabendi Bandarage; Caroline Kronborg; Arul Earnest; Jeremy Millar; David Clouston
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-08-03

6.  Outcomes of combination MRI-targeted and transperineal template biopsy in restaging low-risk prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  Kenneth Chen; Kae Jack Tay; Yan Mee Law; Hakan Aydin; Henry Ho; Christopher Cheng; John Shyi Peng Yuen
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-07-12

7.  Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Neuhaus; Bo Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Baoling Zhang; Shangrong Wu; Yang Zhang; Mingyu Guo; Ranlu Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.