Literature DB >> 19713548

Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States.

Yu-Hsuan Shao1, Kitaw Demissie, Weichung Shih, Amit R Mehta, Mark N Stein, Calpurnyia B Roberts, Robert S Dipaola, Grace L Lu-Yao.   

Abstract

National-level data that characterize contemporary prostate cancer patients are limited. We used 2004-2005 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to generate a contemporary profile of prostate cancer patients (N = 82 541) and compared patient characteristics of this 2004-2005 population with those of patients diagnosed in 1998-1989 and 1996-1997. Among newly diagnosed patients in 2004-2005, the majority (94%) had localized (ie, stage T1 or T2) prostate cancer and a median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 6.7 ng/mL. Between 1988-1989 and 2004-2005, the average age at prostate cancer diagnosis decreased from 72.2 to 67.2 years, and the incidence rate of T3 or T4 cancer decreased from 52.7 per 100 000 to 7.9 per 100 000 among whites and from 90.9 per 100 000 to 13.3 per 100 000 among blacks. In 2004-2005, compared with whites, blacks were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (mean age: 64.7 vs 67.5 years, difference = 2.7 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 2.9 years, P < .001) and to have a higher PSA level at diagnosis (median PSA level: 7.4 vs 6.6 ng/mL, difference = 0.8 ng/mL, 95% CI = 0.6 to 1.0 ng/mL, P < .001). In conclusion, more men were diagnosed with prostate cancer at a younger age and earlier stage in 2004-2005 than in earlier years. The racial disparity in cancer stage at diagnosis has decreased statistically significantly over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713548      PMCID: PMC2744729          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  23 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Andrew C von Eschenbach; Bernard Levin; Carmel Cohen; Carolyn D Runowicz; Stephen Sener; Debbie Saslow; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; F D Gilliland; J W Eley; L C Harlan; R A Stephenson; J L Stanford; P C Albertson; A S Hamilton; W C Hunt; A L Potosky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Exact significance testing to establish treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data.

Authors:  C R Mehta; N R Patel; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Combined-modality staging for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  A V D'Amico
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian Loffredo; Delray Schultz; Ming-Hui Chen; John E Tomaszewski; Andrew A Renshaw; Alan Wein; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prostate cancer grade assignment: the effect of chronological, interpretive and translation bias.

Authors:  Filippos I Kondylis; Richard P Moriarty; David Bostwick; Paul F Schellhammer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Authors:  Jennifer R Stark; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jennifer A Sinnott; Stephen Finn; Anna S Eisenstein; Jing Ma; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Tobias Kurth; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Mark A Rubin; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  79 in total

1.  African-American Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Modern Treatment and Outcome Trends.

Authors:  Augustine C Obirieze; Ambria Moten; Delenya Allen; Chiledum A Ahaghotu
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2014-12-16

2.  Historical prostate cancer screening and treatment outcomes from a single institution.

Authors:  Deanna S Cross; Mark Ritter; Douglas J Reding
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Factors that mediate racial/ethnic disparities in US fetal death rates.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Charlan D Kroelinger; Corinne Ahlberg; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Profiles of Radioresistance Mechanisms in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luksana Chaiswing; Heidi L Weiss; Rani D Jayswal; Daret K St Clair; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2018

5.  The cost implications of prostate cancer screening in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Xiaomei Ma; Rong Wang; Jessica B Long; Joseph S Ross; Pamela R Soulos; James B Yu; Danil V Makarov; Heather T Gold; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Commentary on the State-of-the-Science Conference on the role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

Review 7.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Assessment of acute bowel function after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Is it accurate enough?

Authors:  M Bonet; L Cayetano; M Núñez; E Jovell-Fernández; A Aguilar; Y Ribas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Erik Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg; Jan Adolfsson; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.