Literature DB >> 23864415

Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a large African-American population.

Anup Vora1, Tim Large, Jenny Aronica, Sherod Haynes, Andrew Harbin, Daniel Marchalik, Hanaa Nissim, John Lynch, Gaurav Bandi, Kevin McGeagh, Keith Kowalczyk, Reza Ghasemian, Krishnan Venkatesan, Mohan Verghese, Jonathan Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gleason score from biopsy specimens is important for prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification and influences treatment decisions. Gleason score upgrading (GSU) between biopsy and surgical pathology specimens has been reported as high as 50 % and presents a challenge in counseling low-risk patients. While recent studies have investigated predictors of GSU, populations in these studies have been largely Caucasian. We report our analysis of predictors of GSU in a large urban African-American population.
METHODS: A total of 959 patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy at Georgetown University or Washington Hospital Center between January 2005 and July 2012. Race, age, PSA, body mass index (BMI), cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) score, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy characteristics (percent of biopsy cores showing adenocarcinoma, highest percent of biopsy core involved with cancer, and measured TRUS prostate volume) were analyzed with both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant predictors of GSU while controlling for clinical parameters.
RESULTS: Of the 959 cases, 288 (30.0 %) were upgraded on final pathologic specimen with approximately 38 % (133/355) of African-American patients experiencing GSU. BMI (P = 0.02), percent positive biopsy cores (P < 0.01) and percent of core involved with cancer (P < 0.01), increasing CAPRA score, and serum PSA were independent predictors of GSU on both uni- and multivariate regression analyses. African Americans had a 73 % increase in the incidence of GSU over other races.
CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of low-risk prostate cancer patients were upgraded on final pathology in our series. Higher BMI, serum PSA, CAPRA score, percent of cores positive, and percent of cores involved were independent predictors of GSU. Individuals with those clinical parameters may harbor occult high-grade disease and should be carefully counseled on treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864415     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0495-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  22 in total

1.  Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Robert J Hamilton; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading.

Authors:  Boris Gershman; Douglas M Dahl; Aria F Olumi; Robert H Young; W Scott McDougal; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Judson D Davies; Monty A Aghazadeh; Sharon Phillips; Shady Salem; Sam S Chang; Peter E Clark; Michael S Cookson; Rodney Davis; S Duke Herrell; David F Penson; Joseph A Smith; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Judd W Moul; Lionel L Bañez; Leon Sun; Vladimir Mouraviev; Dongha Xie; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Sung Kyu Hong; Jung Keun Lee; Byung Ki Lee; Sangchul Lee; Oh Sung Kwon; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer?

Authors:  E T Fernandes; C P Sundaram; R Long; M Soltani; C J Ercole
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-04

8.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Boris Schlenker; Majnu John; Alexander Buchner; Peter Stanislaus; Christian Gratzke; Alexander Karl; Gerald Y Tan; Süleyman Ergün; Ashutosh K Tewari; Christian G Stief; Michael Seitz; Oliver Reich
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  The association between prostate size and Gleason score upgrading depends on the number of biopsy cores obtained: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer in men of African origin.

Authors:  Kathleen F McGinley; Kae Jack Tay; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Is active surveillance a suitable option for African American men with prostate cancer? A systemic literature review.

Authors:  M I Gökce; D Sundi; E Schaeffer; C Pettaway
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  The factors predicting upgrading of prostate cancer by using International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system.

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Berrin Güçlüer; Özgür Efiloğlu; Furkan Şendoğan; Ramazan Gökhan Atış; Turhan Çaşkurlu; Asıf Yıldırım
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04

4.  Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.

Authors:  Farzana A Faisal; Debasish Sundi; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mark W Ball; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Edward M Schaeffer; Ashley E Ross
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes for patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosj Yamoah; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Abra Jeffers; Bruce Malkowicz; Elaine Spangler; Jong Y Park; Alice Whittemore; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry - Victoria.

Authors:  Sue M Evans; Varuni Patabendi Bandarage; Caroline Kronborg; Arul Earnest; Jeremy Millar; David Clouston
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-08-03

7.  Extent and predictors of grade upgrading and downgrading in an Australian cohort according to the new prostate cancer grade groupings.

Authors:  Kerri Beckmann; Michael O'Callaghan; Andrew Vincent; Penelope Cohen; Martin Borg; David Roder; Sue Evans; Jeremy Millar; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 8.  Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Characteristics and Cancer-Specific Mortality: An Overview.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Hinata; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.400

9.  Changes observed in prostate biopsy practices in an inner city hospital with a high risk patient population following the 2012 uspstf psa screening recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew W Tam; Johnathan Khusid; Igor Inoyatov; Adan Z Becerra; Jonathan Davila; Jyoti D Chouhan; Jeffrey P Weiss; Llewellyn M Hyacinthe; Brian K McNeil; Andrew G Winer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 10.  Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men.

Authors:  Gabriel Z Leinwand; Andrew T Gabrielson; Louis S Krane; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.