Literature DB >> 18082582

Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: what are the results, and how safe is it?

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer has become increasingly popular in populations in which prostate cancer screening is widespread because of evidence that prostate cancer screening results in the detection of disease that is not clinically significant in many patients (ie, untreated, would not pose a threat to health). The approach is supported by data showing that patients who fall into the category of clinically insignificant disease can be identified with reasonable accuracy and that patients who are initially classified as low risk who reclassify over time as higher risk and are treated radically are still cured in most cases. This means (1) identifying patients who have a low likelihood of disease progression during their lifetime based on clinical and pathologic features of the disease and patient age and comorbidity, (2) close monitoring over time, (3) reasonable criteria for intervention that will both identify more aggressive disease in a timely fashion and not result in excessive treatment, and (4) meeting the communication challenge to reduce the psychological burden of living with untreated cancer. The results of active surveillance, the criteria for patient selection, and the appropriate triggers for intervention are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18082582     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  14 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Role for (11)C-choline PET in active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr Boychak; Larissa Vos; William Makis; Francois-Alexandre Buteau; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew Parliament; Alexander J B McEwan; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Number of prostate cancer risk alleles may identify possibly 'insignificant' disease.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Stacy Loeb; Donghui Kan; William J Catalona
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Michele Janoski; Keith Wachowicz; Atiyah Yahya; Oleksandr Boychak; John Amanie; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew B Parliament; Edith Pituskin; B Gino Fallone; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention?

Authors:  John J Coen; Adam S Feldman; Matthew R Smith; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Judd W Moul; Lionel L Bañez; Leon Sun; Vladimir Mouraviev; Dongha Xie; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Radiotherapy and survival in prostate cancer patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Esther H Zhou; Rodney J Ellis; Edward Cherullo; Valdir Colussi; Fang Xu; Wei-Dong Chen; Sanjay Gupta; Christopher C Whalen; Donald Bodner; Martin I Resnick; Alfred A Rimm; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Outcomes of localized prostate cancer following conservative management.

Authors:  Grace L Lu-Yao; Peter C Albertsen; Dirk F Moore; Weichung Shih; Yong Lin; Robert S DiPaola; Michael J Barry; Anthony Zietman; Michael O'Leary; Elizabeth Walker-Corkery; Siu-Long Yao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Preoperative predictors of pathologic stage T2a and pathologic Gleason score ≤ 6 in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: reference for active surveillance.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Judd W Moul; Lionel Bañez; Leon Sun; Vladimir Mouraviev; Donghua Xie; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.