Literature DB >> 22677074

The relationship of the intensity of posttreatment prostate-specific antigen surveillance and prostate cancer outcomes: results from a population-based cohort.

Mohammed Nabhan1, Simon P Kim, Nilay D Shah, Stephanie M Bagniewski, Qian Shi, R Jeffrey Karnes, Christopher J Weight, Brian J Davis, Manish Kohli, Jon C Tilburt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher intensity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) surveillance was associated with earlier detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of 832 men diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between January 1, 1995, and July 31, 2006. These men were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy (RT), or primary androgen deprivation therapy or chose watchful waiting. To test the associations of intensity in PSA surveillance with study outcomes, we used a 2-year landmark analysis to assess whether the number of PSA tests during the first 2 years after treatment was associated with earlier detection of BCR, prostate cancer-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. We used landmark analysis to assess the association of PSA intensity, adjusting for clinicopathologic covariate, with outcome.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 6.7 years. Higher Gleason score was the only clinicopathologic variable associated with higher PSA frequency in multivariable analysis for both the RP and RT groups (P value of .001 and .05, respectively). After adjustment for other covariates, the frequency of PSA tests during the first 2 years after RP did not increase the ability to detect BCR (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.19) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.30) in the landmark analysis.
CONCLUSION: Higher intensity of PSA surveillance during the 2 years after RP or RT did not improve earlier detection of BCR or survival. Evidence-based guidelines for PSA surveillance after primary treatment are needed.
Copyright © 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677074      PMCID: PMC3498058          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  25 in total

1.  Lifelong yearly prostate specific antigen surveillance is not necessary for low risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew K Tollefson; Michael L Blute; Laureano J Rangel; R Jeffrey Karnes; Igor Frank
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; David C Miller; John T Wei; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans.

Authors:  Edward M Uchio; Mihaela Aslan; Carolyn K Wells; Juan Calderone; John Concato
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-09

5.  Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; Jeff Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Laurel Northouse; Larry Hembroff; Xihong Lin; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Arul Mahadevan; Eric Klein; Adam Kibel; Louis L Pisters; Deborah Kuban; Irving Kaplan; David Wood; Jay Ciezki; Nikhil Shah; John T Wei
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Judd Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The importance of serum prostate-specific antigen testing frequency in assessing biochemical and clinical failure after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jay P Ciezki; Chandana A Reddy; Andrew J Stephenson; Kenneth Angermeier; James Ulchaker; Andrew Altman; Nabil Chehade; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Prostate stem cell antigen expression is associated with gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion and capsular invasion in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ken-Ryu Han; David B Seligson; Xueli Liu; Steve Horvath; Peter I Shintaku; George V Thomas; Jonathan W Said; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Psychosocial factors associated with an increased frequency of prostate cancer screening in men ages 40 to 79 years: the Olmsted County study.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Aruna V Sarma; Michael M Lieber; Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Monica E Gowan; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.