Literature DB >> 18354103

Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

Martin G Sanda1, Rodney L Dunn, Jeff Michalski, Howard M Sandler, Laurel Northouse, Larry Hembroff, Xihong Lin, Thomas K Greenfield, Mark S Litwin, Christopher S Saigal, Arul Mahadevan, Eric Klein, Adam Kibel, Louis L Pisters, Deborah Kuban, Irving Kaplan, David Wood, Jay Ciezki, Nikhil Shah, John T Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify determinants of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of prostate cancer and to measure the effects of such determinants on satisfaction with the outcome of treatment in patients and their spouses or partners.
METHODS: We prospectively measured outcomes reported by 1201 patients and 625 spouses or partners at multiple centers before and after radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external-beam radiotherapy. We evaluated factors that were associated with changes in quality of life within study groups and determined the effects on satisfaction with the treatment outcome.
RESULTS: Adjuvant hormone therapy was associated with worse outcomes across multiple quality-of-life domains among patients receiving brachytherapy or radiotherapy. Patients in the brachytherapy group reported having long-lasting urinary irritation, bowel and sexual symptoms, and transient problems with vitality or hormonal function. Adverse effects of prostatectomy on sexual function were mitigated by nerve-sparing procedures. After prostatectomy, urinary incontinence was observed, but urinary irritation and obstruction improved, particularly in patients with large prostates. No treatment-related deaths occurred; serious adverse events were rare. Treatment-related symptoms were exacerbated by obesity, a large prostate size, a high prostate-specific antigen score, and older age. Black patients reported lower satisfaction with the degree of overall treatment outcomes. Changes in quality of life were significantly associated with the degree of outcome satisfaction among patients and their spouses or partners.
CONCLUSIONS: Each prostate-cancer treatment was associated with a distinct pattern of change in quality-of-life domains related to urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal function. These changes influenced satisfaction with treatment outcomes among patients and their spouses or partners. Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18354103     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  657 in total

1.  Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Karen M Freund; Jack Clark; Julie Darnell; Alan Holden; Douglas Post; Steven R Patierno; Paul C Winters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Meredith M Regan; Matthew R Cooperberg; John T Wei; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Larry Hembroff; Natalia Sadetsky; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin; Eric Klein; Adam S Kibel; Daniel A Hamstra; Louis L Pisters; Deborah A Kuban; Irving D Kaplan; David P Wood; Jay Ciezki; Rodney L Dunn; Peter R Carroll; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Caution with Use of the EPIC-50 Urinary Bother Scale: How Voiding Dysfunction Modifies its Performance.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Adam S Kibel; Graham A Colditz; Ratna Pakpahan; Kellie R Imm; Sonya Izadi; Robert L Grubb; Kathleen Y Wolin; Siobhan Sutcliffe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Future directions in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; April B Cabang; Michael J Wargovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Martin Sanda; Derek Yecies; Lorelei A Mucci; Meir J Stampfer; Stacey A Kenfield
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bernat; Daniela A Wittman; Sarah T Hawley; Daniel A Hamstra; Alexander M Helfand; David A Haggstrom; May Darwish-Yassine; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Concept and viability of androgen annihilation for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  James L Mohler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Localized prostate cancer in Norway, the United States, and Spain: between-country differences of variables before treatment among patients eligible for curative treatment.

Authors:  Anne Holck Storås; Martin G Sanda; Montse Ferrer; Jon Håvard Loge; Alv A Dahl; Eivind A S Steinsvik; Ferran Guedea; Milada Cvancarova; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.