Literature DB >> 20620413

The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care.

Ted A Skolarus1, Yun Zhang, David C Miller, John T Wei, Brent K Hollenbeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most men live with rather than die of prostate cancer. As a result, survivors have a protracted course, harboring considerable clinical and economic implications. Thus, we investigated the extent to which health service use and expenditures vary during continuing prostate cancer care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 105,961 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1992 and 2005 using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. All Medicare payments for prostate cancer related care were assigned to a phase of care (initial, continuing care or end of life), price adjusted and standardized. Patients were sorted into 5 equal groups (quintiles) based on annual per capita continuing care expenditures. We then enumerated the use of common prostate cancer health services.
RESULTS: Average annual per capita continuing care phase expenditures were $36 to $4,724 in the lowest to the highest expenditure group, respectively. Office visits (27.3%) and androgen deprivation (62.7%) comprised most physician related payments for prostate cancer survivorship care. The use of each common health service grew with increasing continuing care intensity (each p <0.001). However, the magnitude of variation in each prostate cancer risk stratum was substantially greater than that between risk strata, eg low risk and metastatic disease, in patients with similar spending.
CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries the prostate cancer continuing care phase is associated with substantial variation, resulting in potentially unnecessary excess cost to the health care system. Variation was evident across the spectrum of disease severity and implies the need for better evidence to inform clinical practice. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620413     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  [Economic importance of postoperative urinary incontinence].

Authors:  V Lent; M Schultheis
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated with Increased Medicare Spending in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Liam C Macleod; Jonathan G Yabes; Mina M Fam; Jathin Bandari; Michelle Yu; Avinash Maganty; Alessandro Furlan; Christopher P Filson; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 4.  Cancer research network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sarah M Greene; Jessica Chubak; Borsika Rabin; Leah Tuzzio; Sharon Rolnick; Terry S Field
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  System-Level Health-Care Integration and the Costs of Cancer Care Across the Disease Continuum.

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Hye Sung Min; Edward C Norton; Zaojun Ye; Jonathan Li; James M Dupree; Chad Ellimoottil; David C Miller; Lindsey A Herrel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Long-term health care costs for prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  M D Krahn; K E Bremner; J Luo; G Tomlinson; S M H Alibhai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  The relationship of the intensity of posttreatment prostate-specific antigen surveillance and prostate cancer outcomes: results from a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Mohammed Nabhan; Simon P Kim; Nilay D Shah; Stephanie M Bagniewski; Qian Shi; R Jeffrey Karnes; Christopher J Weight; Brian J Davis; Manish Kohli; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Evaluating long-term patient-centered outcomes following prostate cancer treatment: findings from the Michigan Prostate Cancer Survivor study.

Authors:  May Darwish-Yassine; Manijeh Berenji; Diane Wing; Glenn Copeland; Raymond Y Demers; Carol Garlinghouse; Angela Fagerlin; Gail E Newth; Laurel Northouse; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; David Rovner; Jerry Sims; John T Wei
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Differences in treatment patterns among patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated by oncologists versus urologists in a US managed care population.

Authors:  Nicole M Engel-Nitz; Berhanu Alemayehu; David Parry; Faith Nathan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men.

Authors:  L G Gordon; S M Walker; M C Mervin; A Lowe; D P Smith; R A Gardiner; S K Chambers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.