Literature DB >> 22670109

Moderators of psychological recovery from benign cancer screening results.

M Pelletier1, B Knäuper, C G Loiselle, R Perreault, C Mizrahi, L Dubé.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The sudden confrontation of a potential health threat such as cancer, even after the diagnosis turns out to be benign, can have enduring adverse psychological consequences, including persistent anxiety, cancer fears, and other manifestations of psychological distress. The present study examines factors that potentially moderate psychological recovery among women who face a breast cancer threat.
DESIGN: Participants were adult women had just received a benign outcome from a breast cancer diagnostic procedure that had been conducted because of suspicion of breast cancer (a non-conclusive mammography or ultrasonography result, a referral from their doctor because of pain or family history, detection of a lump, a 6-month follow-up appointment after a breast abnormality from a previous screening or diagnostic procedure, or a fluid leak from one or both breasts). We measured several psychological traits at Time 1 (right after receipt of the "no cancer" feedback) and then each month for the next 3 months. Analyses examined the factors that hindered or facilitated psychological recovery from the cancer threat.
RESULTS: Results showed that trait anxiety and family history of cancer hindered recovery and that older age and optimism facilitated recovery and lessened adverse psychological consequences. Self-regulatory strategies such as planful problem-solving, positive reappraisal, and mastery facilitated recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings shed light on the factors that are implicated in psychological recovery from a benign breast cancer outcome after a diagnostic procedure (ultrasonography, repeat or initial mammography, stereotactic biopsy, fine-needle aspiration, or ultrasound-guided biopsy). Those factors could be used to identify women who may experience prolonged psychological distress, so as to assist them when they face stressful diagnostic concerns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; cancer screening; coping behavior; emotional adjustment; mammography; psychological recovery

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670109      PMCID: PMC3364780          DOI: 10.3747/co.19.935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  32 in total

1.  Information needs, uncertainty, and anxiety in women who had a breast biopsy with benign outcome.

Authors:  K A Deane; L F Degner
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 2.  US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination. A critical review.

Authors:  M S O'Malley; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; M W Bridges
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

4.  Breast screening: adverse psychological consequences one month after placing women on early recall because of a diagnostic uncertainty. A multicentre study.

Authors:  G Ong; J Austoker; J Brett
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  T M Kolb; J Lichy; J H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old.

Authors:  P C Stomper; D J D'Souza; P A DiNitto; M A Arredondo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; S M Miller; M Daly; A Masny
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Performance of breast self-examination by women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  S W Alagna; P J Morokoff; J M Bevett; D M Reddy
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1987

Review 9.  Identification and management of the woman at increased risk for breast cancer development.

Authors:  M Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; C Sands; A Balshem; E Lustbader; T Heggan; L Goldstein; J James; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Non-normal Screening Mammography Results, Lumpectomies, and Breast Cancer Reported by California Women, 2001-2009.

Authors:  Veronica L Irvin; Nancy Breen; Helen I Meissner; Benmei Liu; Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-06-09

2.  Can breast ultrasound reduce patient's level of anxiety and pain?

Authors:  Fariba Zarei; Parisa Pishdad; Mohammad Hatami; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-02-16

3.  The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy.

Authors:  Caroline S Dorfman; Eneka Lamb; Alyssa Van Denburg; Anava A Wren; Mary Scott Soo; Kaylee Faircloth; Vicky Gandhi; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11

Review 4.  Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Unintended consequences of an 'all-clear' diagnosis for potential cancer symptoms: a nested qualitative interview study with primary care patients.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Katriina L Whitaker; Kelly Winstanley; Susanne Cromme; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.