Literature DB >> 7641664

Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

M D Schwartz1, C Lerman, S M Miller, M Daly, A Masny.   

Abstract

The authors examined predictors of psychological distress among women who were at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Participants were 103 women who had at least 1 first degree relative with ovarian cancer. Specifically, the authors tested the relationship between the dispositional attentional style of monitoring (the tendency to scan for threat-relevant information), perceptions of risk for ovarian cancer, intrusive thoughts regarding ovarian cancer, and psychological distress. Overall, this sample exhibited moderately high levels of psychological distress. High scores on monitoring were associated with high perceived risk for ovarian cancer and elevated levels of intrusive thoughts and psychological distress. Finally, the authors proposed and tested a path model describing the interrelationships between these variables. The results of this study are discussed in terms of their implications for treating the psychological distress associated with being at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7641664     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  41 in total

1.  Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

2.  Matching intra-procedural information with coping style reduces psychophysiological arousal in women undergoing colposcopy.

Authors:  Susanna Kola; Jane C Walsh; Brian M Hughes; Siobhán Howard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06-24

3.  Modeling pathways to affective barriers on colorectal cancer screening among Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

4.  Effects of web-based instruction and patient preferences on patient-reported outcomes and learning for women with advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Julie Cragg; Molly McClellan; Daniel Chan; Julie A Jacko; François Sainfort; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  Being 'at-risk' for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Erga Drori; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-09-19

6.  Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Karen J Ruth; Yu-Ning Wong; Katen C McCully; Christina M Rybak; Neal J Meropol; Michael J Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Interaction of Comparative Cancer Risk and Cancer Efficacy Perceptions on Cancer-Related Information Seeking and Scanning Behaviors.

Authors:  Norman C H Wong
Journal:  Commun Res Rep       Date:  2012-07

8.  Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita H Halbert; Tiffani A DeMarco; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Racial Discrimination, John Henryism, and Depression Among African Americans.

Authors:  Darrell L Hudson; Harold W Neighbors; Arline T Geronimus; James S Jackson
Journal:  J Black Psychol       Date:  2016-05-08

10.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.