Literature DB >> 3424847

Performance of breast self-examination by women at high risk for breast cancer.

S W Alagna1, P J Morokoff, J M Bevett, D M Reddy.   

Abstract

Women at high risk for breast cancer were compared to low risk women with respect to frequency of breast self-examination (BSE), knowledge and quality of BSE, and attitudinal variables. The women at high risk did not practice BSE more frequently than women at low risk, although they were more knowledgeable about BSE, more focused on breast cancer, and less confident in physician proficiency in conducting a breast exam. The rate of monthly BSE practice was low in both groups. Self-confidence about performing BSE was most strongly associated with BSE frequency in both groups. No other variables predicted BSE frequency in the high risk group. In the low risk group, knowledge of BSE technique and breast cancer focus were additional significant predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3424847     DOI: 10.1300/J013v12n02_03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Health        ISSN: 0363-0242


  10 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

3.  Illness causal attributions: an exploratory study of their structure and associations with other illness cognitions and perceptions of control.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Dana Rashuk-Rosenthal; Yael Benyamini
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-08

4.  Breast self-examination: knowledge, attitudes, and performance among black women.

Authors:  T C Jacob; N E Penn; M Brown
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?

Authors:  K Brain; J Gray; P Norman; E Parsons; A Clarke; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Moderators of psychological recovery from benign cancer screening results.

Authors:  M Pelletier; B Knäuper; C G Loiselle; R Perreault; C Mizrahi; L Dubé
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  First-degree relatives of persons suffering from osteoporosis: beliefs, knowledge, and health-related behavior.

Authors:  Perla Werner; David Olchovsky; Hava Erlich-Gelaki; Iris Vered
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Lynne Pahl; Melinda Begeman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives.

Authors:  E Ormondroyd; C Moynihan; M Watson; C Foster; S Davolls; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Predictive testing for BRCA1/2: attributes, risk perception and management in a multi-centre clinical cohort.

Authors:  C Foster; D G R Evans; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; L Brooks; R Davidson; J Mackay; P J Morrison; M Watson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.