Literature DB >> 22667250

Subjective judgments by climate experts.

M G Morgan, D W Keith.   

Abstract

Year:  1995        PMID： 22667250     DOI： 10.1021/es00010a753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN： 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing.

Authors:  Kirsten Zickfeld; M Granger Morgan; David J Frame; David W Keith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Climate change: do we know enough for policy action?

Authors:  Stephen H Schneider
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment.

Authors:  Uriel Haran; Don A Moore; Carey K Morewedge
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2010-12

4.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system.

Authors:  Timothy M Lenton; Hermann Held; Elmar Kriegler; Jim W Hall; Wolfgang Lucht; Stefan Rahmstorf; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system.

Authors:  Elmar Kriegler; Jim W Hall; Hermann Held; Richard Dawson; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdulla; Inês Lima Azevedo; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Informing Public Perceptions About Climate Change: A 'Mental Models' Approach.

Authors:  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Communicating scientific uncertainty.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Alex L Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.

Authors:  M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.