Literature DB >> 28405257

A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment.

Uriel Haran1, Don A Moore2, Carey K Morewedge1.   

Abstract

Overprecision is the most robust type of overconfidence. We present a new method that significantly reduces this bias and offers insight into its underlying cause. In three experiments, overprecision was significantly reduced by forcing participants to consider all possible outcomes of an event. Each participant was presented with the entire range of possible outcomes divided into intervals, and estimated each interval's likelihood of including the true answer. The superiority of this Subjective Probability Interval Estimate (SPIES) method is robust to range widths and interval grain sizes. Its carryover effects are observed even in subsequent estimates made using the conventional, 90% confidence interval method: judges who first made SPIES judgments considered a broader range of values in subsequent conventional interval estimates as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; interval estimates; judgment; overconfidence; overprecision; subjective probability

Year:  2010        PMID: 28405257      PMCID: PMC5386407     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak        ISSN: 1930-2975


  10 in total

1.  Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1999-09

2.  OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS.

Authors:  S OSKAMP
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1965-06

3.  Overconfidence in interval estimates.

Authors:  Jack B Soll; Joshua Klayman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Subjective judgments by climate experts.

Authors:  M G Morgan; D W Keith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing.

Authors:  Kirsten Zickfeld; M Granger Morgan; David J Frame; David W Keith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.

Authors:  Peter Juslin; Anders Winman; Patrik Hansson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The trouble with overconfidence.

Authors:  Don A Moore; Paul J Healy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation.

Authors:  Anders Winman; Patrik Hansson; Peter Juslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment.

Authors:  Carey K Morewedge; Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Physician's use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski; J B Bushyhead
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  On social attribution: implications of recent cognitive neuroscience research for race, law, and politics.

Authors:  Darren Schreiber
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Individual Differences in Base Rate Neglect: A Fuzzy Processing Preference Index.

Authors:  Christopher R Wolfe; Christopher R Fisher
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 3.  Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Laura Bojke; Marta Soares; Karl Claxton; Abigail Colson; Aimée Fox; Christopher Jackson; Dina Jankovic; Alec Morton; Linda Sharples; Andrea Taylor
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Choice Quality as a Function of Decision Accuracy and Search Cost.

Authors:  Reza Rastgoo Sisakht; Shabnam Mousavi; Rahimeh Negarandeh; Hamid Valizadegan; Maryam Noroozian; Mehdi Tehrani-Doost; Emran Mohammad Razaghi
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07

5.  Joy Leads to Overconfidence, and a Simple Countermeasure.

Authors:  Philipp Koellinger; Theresa Treffers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Overconfidence over the lifespan.

Authors:  Julia P Prims; Don A Moore
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2017-01

7.  Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations.

Authors:  Michael Muthukrishna; Joseph Henrich; Wataru Toyokawa; Takeshi Hamamura; Tatsuya Kameda; Steven J Heine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.