Literature DB >> 23716682

Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.

Ahmed Abdulla1, Inês Lima Azevedo, M Granger Morgan.   

Abstract

Analysts and decision makers frequently want estimates of the cost of technologies that have yet to be developed or deployed. Small modular reactors (SMRs), which could become part of a portfolio of carbon-free energy sources, are one such technology. Existing estimates of likely SMR costs rely on problematic top-down approaches or bottom-up assessments that are proprietary. When done properly, expert elicitations can complement these approaches. We developed detailed technical descriptions of two SMR designs and then conduced elicitation interviews in which we obtained probabilistic judgments from 16 experts who are involved in, or have access to, engineering-economic assessments of SMR projects. Here, we report estimates of the overnight cost and construction duration for five reactor-deployment scenarios that involve a large reactor and two light water SMRs. Consistent with the uncertainty introduced by past cost overruns and construction delays, median estimates of the cost of new large plants vary by more than a factor of 2.5. Expert judgments about likely SMR costs display an even wider range. Median estimates for a 45 megawatts-electric (MWe) SMR range from $4,000 to $16,300/kWe and from $3,200 to $7,100/kWe for a 225-MWe SMR. Sources of disagreement are highlighted, exposing the thought processes of experts involved with SMR design. There was consensus that SMRs could be built and brought online about 2 y faster than large reactors. Experts identify more affordable unit cost, factory fabrication, and shorter construction schedules as factors that may make light water SMRs economically viable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nuclear power economics; technology assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716682      PMCID: PMC3683777          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300195110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

Review 1.  Decision analysis: an overview.

Authors:  R L Keeney
Journal:  Oper Res       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.310

2.  Subjective judgments by climate experts.

Authors:  M G Morgan; D W Keith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing.

Authors:  Kirsten Zickfeld; M Granger Morgan; David J Frame; David W Keith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies.

Authors:  Aimee E Curtright; M Granger Morgan; David W Keith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Expert judgment assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S.

Authors:  Henry A Roman; Katherine D Walker; Tyra L Walsh; Lisa Conner; Harvey M Richmond; Bryan J Hubbell; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.

Authors:  M Granger Morgan; Ahmed Abdulla; Michael J Ford; Michael Rath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.

Authors:  M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.

Authors:  Zachariah Steven Baird; Dmitri Neshumayev; Oliver Järvik; Kody M Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways.

Authors:  Benjamin K Sovacool; Chad M Baum; Sean Low
Journal:  Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Can Distributed Nuclear Power Address Energy Resilience and Energy Poverty?

Authors:  Alexander Q Gilbert; Morgan D Bazilian
Journal:  Joule       Date:  2020-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.